These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6587899)

  • 1. Cavo-surface angles, amalgam margin angles and occlusal cavity preparations.
    Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1984 May; 156(9):319-24. PubMed ID: 6587899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial preparations for amalgam restorations: extending the longevity of the tooth-restoration unit.
    Summitt JB; Osborne JW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1992 Nov; 123(11):67-73. PubMed ID: 1469207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Stratis S; Bryant RW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 25(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 9610854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the margin region of amalgam restorations: a simulated clinical study.
    Bryant RW
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1992; 6():39-45. PubMed ID: 1300132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cavosurface margin geometry in conventional and air abrasion Class V cavity preparations.
    Boston DW; Alperstein KS; Boberick K
    Am J Dent; 1997 Apr; 10(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 9545897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The retentive function of dihedral angles in simple Class I amalgam cavities].
    Consani S; Sartini Filho R; Nascimento HD
    Vida Odontol; 1983 Dec; 6(15):25-34, 37. PubMed ID: 6592787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cavity design and marginal degradation of the occlusal part of Class-II amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):389-97. PubMed ID: 2288211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Caries recurrence at the margin of silver amalgam restorations].
    Poggio C; Lanati C
    Dent Cadmos; 1984 Jun; 52(6):49-52. PubMed ID: 6596222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using Amalgambond and Copalite.
    Edgren BN; Denehy GE
    Am J Dent; 1992 Dec; 5(6):296-8. PubMed ID: 1304174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental amalgam: success or failure?
    Harris RK
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(6):243-52. PubMed ID: 1303517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 1410252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage and enamel finish.
    Khera SC; Chan KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Apr; 39(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 273692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of grooves on resistance form of conservative Class 2 amalgams.
    Summitt JB; Howell ML; Burgess JO; Dutton FB; Osborne JW
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):50-6. PubMed ID: 1437687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation of dental amalgam to the cavosurface margin of Class I cavity preparations.
    Symons AL; Wing G; Hewitt GH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Jan; 14(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 3469378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cavo-surface angles, amalgam margin angles and occlusal cavity preparations.
    Green RM; Jacobsen PH; Edmunds DH
    Br Dent J; 1984 Jun; 156(11):385-6. PubMed ID: 6587883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Improvement of the tooth cavity shape for amalgam filling].
    Chen WQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Ke Za Zhi; 1984 Mar; 19(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 6593190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of cavity geometry on heat transmission in restored teeth.
    Spierings TA; Peters MC; Bosman F; Plasschaert AJ
    J Dent; 1986 Apr; 14(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 3469238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pin vs. slot retention in extensive amalgam restorations.
    Outhwaite WC; Garman TA; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Apr; 41(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 284120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cavity preparations that extend the clinical longevity of amalgam restorations.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    J Ala Dent Assoc; 1993; 77(3):12-8. PubMed ID: 8188974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.