These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6588117)

  • 1. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries.
    White SC; Hollender L; Gratt BM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 108(5):755-9. PubMed ID: 6588117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interproximal caries detection: how good are we?
    Dykstra B
    Dent Today; 2008 Apr; 27(4):144, 146-7. PubMed ID: 18497209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.
    White SC; Gratt BM; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Feb; 65(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 3422729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of xeroradiographs and two types of film for detecting caries in approximal surfaces of primary teeth.
    White SC; McMullin K
    Caries Res; 1986; 20(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 3463427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical comparison between xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of recurrent caries.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Apr; 65(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 3163139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Kang B-C ; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.
    Wenzel A; Larsen MJ; Fejerskov O
    Caries Res; 1991; 25(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 1747887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caries detection with xeroradiographs: the influence of observer experience.
    White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul; 64(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 3475648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries.
    Seneadza V; Koob A; Kaltschmitt J; Staehle HJ; Duwenhoegger J; Eickholz P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 18316505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RVG-ui: a sensor to rival direct-exposure intra-oral x-ray film.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jul; 2(3):183-96. PubMed ID: 11351483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image analysis of radiolucencies in approximal enamel: a comparison of xeroradiographic and conventional film images.
    Shearer AC; Pitts NB; Wilson NH; Hutton JB; Wastell DG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Apr; 67(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 2726206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.
    White SC; Yoon DC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Jun; 21(6):530-2, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 11199671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
    Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pitfalls in radiographic interpretation, Part 1.
    Serman N; Singer S
    Dent Today; 2000 May; 19(5):100-5. PubMed ID: 12524768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital enhancement of radiographs: can it improve caries diagnosis?
    Shrout MK; Russell CM; Potter BJ; Powell BJ; Hildebolt CF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Apr; 127(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 8655867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.