These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6588448)
81. Standard of care in medical malpractice cases. Rheingold PD; Davey PF Leg Med Annu; 1974; 0(0):279-301. PubMed ID: 4376829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
82. [Reproach of malpractice - legal procedure and possible consequences]. Dittmann V; Hausmann R Ther Umsch; 2008 Jul; 65(7):389-93. PubMed ID: 18622922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Consent to operate, to live, or to die. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1972 Oct; 46(19):124-8. PubMed ID: 5070775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
84. Informed consent: history, theory, and practice. Rose RM Am J Otol; 1986 Jan; 7(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 3511730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
85. The professional liability crisis. The 1986 Duke Private Sector Conference. Iglehart JK N Engl J Med; 1986 Oct; 315(17):1105-8. PubMed ID: 3762629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
86. [Informed consent after enlightenment by medical student]. Wienke A; Sailer R Laryngorhinootologie; 2014 Oct; 93(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 25302597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
87. The doctrine of two schools of thought--a shield or a sword. Weil Z; Gruber D Med Law; 2000; 19(4):663-702. PubMed ID: 11289640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Communication and malpractice lawsuits. Kraus K; Cameron ME J Prof Nurs; 2004; 20(1):3, 75. PubMed ID: 15011185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
89. Law and the surgeon. Norton ML Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1972 May; 134(5):851-8. PubMed ID: 5064082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
91. A procrustean approach to informed consent: the Texas Medical Disclosure Panel. Richards EP; Rathbun KC Law Med Health Care; 1982 Sep; 10(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 6923126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
92. The law of medical professional liability. Beckman WH Clin Neurosurg; 1976; 23():520-5. PubMed ID: 975701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
93. On expert testimony. The Supreme Court of the Federal Republic of Germany (September 27, 1977). Deutsch E Med Law; 1983; 2(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 6687086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
94. Legal implications of intraoperative consultation. Irwin JR Urol Clin North Am; 1985 Aug; 12(3):557-70. PubMed ID: 4024392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Medical malpractic: a lawyer's view. Knepper WE W V Med J; 1970 Nov; 66(11):386-91. PubMed ID: 5293546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
96. [Endoscopic surgery and malpractice]. Ulsenheimer K Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1995; 257(1-4):29-36. PubMed ID: 8579409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
98. The psychological repercussions of New York State's do-not-resuscitate law. An American experience with mandated "truth-telling". Lederberg MS Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1997 Feb; 809():223-36. PubMed ID: 9103573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
99. Perfection of standards, and informed consent in preventing malpractice suits. Huffington PE Md State Med J; 1970 Jan; 19(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 5411830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
100. When are expert witnesses liable for their malpractice? Richards EP; Walter C IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2000; 19(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 10738669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]