381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6588755)
1. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition.
Wieslander L
Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6588755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.
Croft RS; Buschang PH; English JD; Meyer R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Bishara SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions.
Vargervik K; Harvold EP
Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 3862347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Intensive treatment in severe distal bite using the headgear-Herbst appliance in mixed dentition].
Wieslander L
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed (1984); 1984 Nov; 94(11):1189-206. PubMed ID: 6595787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA
Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
Cura N; Saraç M
Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA; Tollaro I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):502-9. PubMed ID: 9155809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse?
Wieslander L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Oct; 104(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 8213652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
Pancherz H
Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report.
Shah AH
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.
Gu Y; Rabie AB; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 10842112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of Class II, division 1 treatment with the headgear-activator combination followed by the edgewise appliance.
Janson G; Caffer Dde C; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Neves LS
Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):594-604. PubMed ID: 15529492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
Strahm C; De Sousa AP; Grobéty D; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
