These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6588760)

  • 1. Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults.
    Farkas LG; Katic MJ; Hreczko TA; Deutsch C; Munro IR
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 6588760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The attractive lip: A photomorphometric analysis.
    Penna V; Fricke A; Iblher N; Eisenhardt SU; Stark GB
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):920-9. PubMed ID: 25921652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women.
    Budai M; Farkas LG; Tompson B; Katic M; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 14(2):154-61; discussion 162-3. PubMed ID: 12621284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cephalometric investigation of horizontal lip position in adult Nigerians.
    Ikenna Isiekwe G; Olatokunbo DaCosta O; Chukwudi Isiekwe M
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):160-9. PubMed ID: 22984100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals.
    Scheideman GB; Bell WH; Legan HL; Finn RA; Reisch JS
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Oct; 78(4):404-20. PubMed ID: 6933849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of soft tissue facial profile in white males.
    Zylinski CG; Nanda RS; Kapila S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 1598891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of facial convexity on antero-posterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15898368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; Kau CH; Velagrakis G; Tzanakakis GN; de Bree E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e71-5. PubMed ID: 26703056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The frontal soft tissue changes in the lower facial portion after orthodontic treatment combined with anterior segmental osteotomy.
    Cha YM; Park NS; Bayome M; Han SH; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(3):232-41. PubMed ID: 22022694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Croatians using of linear measurements.
    Milosević SA; Varga ML; Slaj M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 18216697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postoperative changes of the soft tissue profile after mandibular vestibulolingual sulcoplasty with free skin grafting.
    Adawy AM; Hjørting-Hansen E; Hillerup S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1983 Feb; 41(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 6337244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the frontal esthetic preferences in the lower facial portion of Koreans and Caucasians.
    Kang YG; Lee YH; Kook YA; Kim SH; Sinclair PM
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19582252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue change gradients after mandibular setback surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Lim YK; Chu EH; Lee DY; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):896-903. PubMed ID: 20578861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.