These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6589255)

  • 1. Immediate-polished and as-carved Tytin restorations after 12 months.
    Fenton RA; Smales RJ
    J Dent; 1984 Jun; 12(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 6589255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immediate-polished and as-carved Tytin restorations after three years.
    Smales RJ; Fenton RA
    J Dent; 1985 Jun; 13(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 3861636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations.
    Bryant RW; Collins CJ
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different levels of polishing of amalgam restorations on the plaque retention and gingival inflammation.
    Laurell L; Rylander H; Pettersson B
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):45-53. PubMed ID: 6576491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of three clinical methods for assessing amalgam and resin restorations.
    Smales RJ; Creaven PJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):340-6. PubMed ID: 3864971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finishing techniques for amalgam restorations: clinical assessment at three years.
    Bryant RW; Collins CJ
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Oct; 37(5):333-9. PubMed ID: 1444953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of the gingival response to polished and unpolished amalgam restorations.
    Hadavi F; Caffesse RG; Charbeneau GT
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1986 Mar; 52(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 3513918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rugosimetric analysis of amalgam restorations polished using different techniques.
    Pereira MA; Centola AL; do Nascimento TN; Turbino ML
    Braz Dent J; 1998; 9(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 10219120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of finishing techniques for assessing surface roughness of amalgam restorations.
    Ulusoy N; Aydin AK; Ulusoy M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Mar; 57(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 3471943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why do we polish? Part Two.
    Larson T
    Northwest Dent; 2011; 90(4):31-8. PubMed ID: 21932633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finishing of amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Collins CJ; Bryant RW
    J Dent; 1992 Aug; 20(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 1430508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface treatment of mercury-free alloys.
    Geiger SB; Gurbatov D; Dariel MP; Eichmiller FC; Liberman R; Ratzker M
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10483447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical behavior of repaired amalgam restorations: a two-year study.
    Cipriano TM; Santos JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jan; 73(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 7699605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Stratis S; Bryant RW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 25(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 9610854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Copper in approximal plaque from conventional and non-gamma-2 amalgam restorations.
    Wallman C; Afseth J; Emilson CG
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Apr; 50(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 1604968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Valiant-PhD and Lojic N amalgam alloys: four-year clinical results.
    Smales RJ; Rupinskas L
    Aust Dent J; 1991 Aug; 36(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 1789763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polishing dental amalgam restorations.
    de Vries J; de Wet FA; Eick JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Aug; 58(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 3476725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of polishing on the marginal integrity of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 6585528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation.
    Marks LA; Weerheijm KL; van Amerongen WE; Groen HJ; Martens LC
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 10460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The new generation amalgam alloys. Clinical considerations.
    Jordan RE; Suzuki M; Boksman L
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr; 29(2):341-58. PubMed ID: 3858165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.