These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6589255)
21. A study of procedures for burnishing amalgam restorations. Bauer JG J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jun; 57(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 3473230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Finishing and polishing criteria for minimally invasive composite restorations. LeSage B Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):422-8; quiz 429-30. PubMed ID: 22313913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Experimental research on the finishing and polishing of amalgam fillings]. Staehle HJ; Rummler A Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 1866610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [A study of different polishing techniques for amalgams and glass-cermet cement by scanning electron microscope (SEM)]. Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G; Argiri G Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 2518600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study). Kamel FM Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Moncada G; Fernández E; Martín J; Arancibia C; Mjör IA; Gordan VV Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A 30-month clinical evaluation of the influence of finishing and size of restoration on the margin performance of five amalgam alloys. Birtcil RF; Pelzner RB; Stark MM J Dent Res; 1981 Dec; 60(12):1949-56. PubMed ID: 7028822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Determining amalgam marginal quality: effect of occlusal surface condition. Woods PW; Marker VA; McKinney TW; Miller BH; Okabe T J Am Dent Assoc; 1993 May; 124(5):60-5. PubMed ID: 8482782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Microscopic observations of amalgams carved by different methods and subsequently polished. Dahi F; Dorfman RL; Asgar K; Corpron RE J Am Dent Assoc; 1978 Aug; 97(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 277590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Finishing the interdental space in amalgam restorations: S.E.M. observations]. Fuzzi M; Angelini E Riv Odontoiatr Amici Brugg; 1985; 4(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 3867834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results. Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Surface roughness of restorations and plaque adhesion. Experimental studies in vitro]. Shimano N; Tomita F Kanagawa Shigaku; 1986 Mar; 20(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 3461167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of ultrasonic cleaning and air polishing on the marginal integrity of radicular amalgam and composite resin restorations. An in vitro study. Gorfil C; Nordenberg D; Liberman R; Ben-Amar A J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Mar; 16(3):137-9. PubMed ID: 2656763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]