These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6589282)

  • 21. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.
    Ramp LC; Broome JC; Ramp MH
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro wear of packable dental composites.
    Ferracane JL; Choi KK; Condon JR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (25):S60-6; quiz S74. PubMed ID: 11908398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A study of retentive filler and its use in dentistry.
    Xu HC; Wang T; Heindl D; Zheng G; Liu WY; Nagel JR
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Sep; 1(2):7-12. PubMed ID: 10557187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Subsurface damage layer of in vivo worn dental composite restorations.
    Wu W; Toth EE; Moffa JF; Ellison JA
    J Dent Res; 1984 May; 63(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 6200522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [In vivo wear test for posterior composites. 1. Development of wear test predicting composite wear in vivo].
    Horie K; Satoh M; Kawakita H; Hosoda H
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Mar; 9(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 2135520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wear patterns of composite restorative resins in vivo; observations by scanning electron microscopy.
    Xu HC; Tong W; Song SQ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1985 Sep; 12(5):389-400. PubMed ID: 3862798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of aging solutions on wear resistance and hardness of selected resin-based dental composites.
    Chladek G; Basa K; Żmudzki J; Malara P; Nowak AJ; Kasperski J
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(3):43-52. PubMed ID: 27840447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three body wear studies of five dental composites preconditioned in food simulating media.
    Mair LH; Krishnan VK
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 10572618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of fiber volume fraction and length on the wear characteristics of glass fiber-reinforced dental composites.
    Callaghan DJ; Vaziri A; Nayeb-Hashemi H
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 16002133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Status report on microfilled composite restorative resin. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment.
    Dennison JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1982 Sep; 105(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 6957461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists.
    Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Color stability of new composite restorative materials under accelerated aging.
    Powers JM; Fan PL; Raptis CN
    J Dent Res; 1980 Dec; 59(12):2071-4. PubMed ID: 6941995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities.
    Ferracane JL; Mitchem JC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 14579877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Two-body wear simulation influence on some direct and indirect dental resin biocomposites - A qualitative analysis.
    Caracostea A; Morar N; Florea A; Soanca A; Badea ME
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(3):61-72. PubMed ID: 27840440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differential wear of teeth and restorative materials: clinical implications.
    Yip KH; Smales RJ; Kaidonis JA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15237885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage.
    Cenci MS; Venturini D; Pereira-Cenci T; Piva E; Demarco FF
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 18435191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Slow crack propagation in composite restorative materials.
    Montes-G GM; Draughn RA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 May; 21(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 3584167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Mar; 89(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 293032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wear resistance of a modified polymethyl methacrylate artificial tooth compared to five commercially available artificial tooth materials.
    Kamonwanon P; Yodmongkol S; Chantarachindawong R; Thaweeboon S; Thaweeboon B; Srikhirin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 25882971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.