These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams. Hu X; Marquis PM; Shortall AC J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 10424987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro wear of microfilled and visible light-cured composites. Fan PL; Powers JM; Craig RG J Dent Res; 1979 Nov; 58(11):2116-9. PubMed ID: 292679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two- and three-body wear of composite resins. Koottathape N; Takahashi H; Iwasaki N; Kanehira M; Finger WJ Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1261-70. PubMed ID: 23083806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. Yap AU; Ong LF; Teoh SH; Hastings GW J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Mar; 26(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 10194732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Status report on microfilled composite restorative resin. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. Dennison JB J Am Dent Assoc; 1982 Sep; 105(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 6957461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites. Lutz F; Phillips RW; Roulet JF; Setcos JC J Dent Res; 1984 Jun; 63(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 6588079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives. Suzuki S; Nagai E; Taira Y; Minesaki Y J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Water and abrasive effects on three-body wear of composites. Sarrett DC; Söderholm KJ; Batich CD J Dent Res; 1991 Jul; 70(7):1074-81. PubMed ID: 1829738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. Part II. An SEM evaluation. Yap AU; Ong LF; Teoh SH; Hastings GW J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jan; 27(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10632843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Occlusal contact area (OCA) wear of two new composite restoratives. Yap AU J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Feb; 29(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 11856400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler. Lu H; Lee YK; Oguri M; Powers JM Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 17153985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Properties of microfilled composite resins as influenced by filler content. St Germain H; Swartz ML; Phillips RW; Moore BK; Roberts TA J Dent Res; 1985 Feb; 64(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 2982935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional and microfilled composite resins. Part II. Chip fractures. Lambrechts P; Ameye C; Vanherle G J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Nov; 48(5):527-38. PubMed ID: 6958862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites. St-Georges AJ; Swift EJ; Thompson JY; Heymann HO Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12120780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]