These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6589706)

  • 1. [Correlation between the apical bases (ANB angle) and cephalometric discrepancies evaluated with the "I" line and 1-VT distance, in non-orthodontic patients].
    Galvao CA
    Rev Iberoam Ortod; 1983 Sep; 3(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 6589706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Circle method analysis--a roentgen-cephalometric aid to orthodontic diagnosis.
    Peltomäki T
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1988; 84(5-6):297-303. PubMed ID: 3227022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.
    Chandra PK; Godfrey K
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2152434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 3465233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the correlation box (Segner) for characterization of the facial skeleton.
    Järvinen SH
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1992; 88(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 1470631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric appraisal for craniofacial imbalances in orthodontic & surgical anomalies.
    Bowden BD
    Aust Orthod J; 1980 Oct; 6(4):154-77. PubMed ID: 6940560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of the cephalometric analyses of Bjørk, Ricketts and Sassouni with the measurements of MacNamara and Wits].
    Bolender Y; Deblock L; Theuveny T; Bolender CJ; Turlot JC
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1986; 20(2):251-71. PubMed ID: 3466314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cephalometric analysis according to Delaire].
    Chimenti C; Cascone P; Silvestri A; Iannetti G
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1981; 50(7-8):571-85. PubMed ID: 6960425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The numberless ruler.
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(4):32. PubMed ID: 21922985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Steiner cephalometric analysis: predicted and actual treatment outcome compared.
    Abdullah RT; Kuijpers MA; Bergé SJ; Katsaros C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 May; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 16764682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparative evaluation of Steiner's and McNamara's methods for determining the position of the bone bases].
    Oria A; Schellino E; Massaglia M; Fornengo B
    Minerva Stomatol; 1991 Jun; 40(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 1944052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Orthodontic studies in mouth breathing].
    Limme M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1993; 47(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 8317215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Sagittal displacement of the jaws and of their cephalometric measurements].
    Benauwt A
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1979 Jul; 13(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 297257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The angle of flexure in patients with increased lower anterior facial height].
    Karamalikis DD
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1986 Aug; 40(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 3095751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The sagittal relation of the craniofacial skeletal base as analysed by 3 cephalometric methods based respectively on angle, line and arch value].
    Miotti F
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1983; 2(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 6583174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Correlation between the ANB angle and the cephalometics discrepancy in orthodontic patients].
    Vigorito JW
    Ars Curandi Odontol; 1977 Nov; 4(8):36-8. PubMed ID: 352319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The percentage reliability of Angle ANB.
    Chandra KG
    J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1987 Jun; 1(2):55-60, 71. PubMed ID: 3269789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of soft tissue references for anteroposterior measurement of dental bases.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Colombo A; Ciusa V; Bignotto M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 9835820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.