These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6589706)
41. Asymmetry of the human facial skeleton. Vig PS; Hewitt AB Angle Orthod; 1975 Apr; 45(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 1054939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. [Craniofacial statistical parameters in a young adult population of northern France. Teleradiographic cephalometric study using sagittal projections]. Cousin RP Orthod Fr; 1979; 50():641-51. PubMed ID: 298977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The quadrilateral analysis: an individualized skeletal assessment. Di Paolo RJ; Philip C; Maganzini AL; Hirce JD Am J Orthod; 1983 Jan; 83(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 6571768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Methodologic problems in the study of the craniofacial complex]. Pinto-Cisternas J; Muller G; Champin J Rev Iberoam Ortod; 1983 Sep; 3(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 6589703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Orthodontic diagnostic relevance of the Wits cephalometric method and the arc method in the evaluation of the sagittal relation of the basal cranial structures]. Miotti F G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1982 Dec; 1(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 6964569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion. Mouakeh M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):640-9. PubMed ID: 11395709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars. Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies. Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes. Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Considerations on the cephalometric evaluation of point A]. Scotti L; Bondi M Mondo Ortod; 1983; 8(6):61-4. PubMed ID: 6590962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment. Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Evaluation of the applicability of a mathematical model in the x-ray cephalometric diagnosis of sagittal bite anomalies. A clinical test]. Järvinen S Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1989 Oct; 50(5):465-72. PubMed ID: 2583629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Differential diagnosis of retrusive defects of facial skeletal structures]. Jedlicková O Prakt Zubn Lek; 1986 Jul; 34(6):173-8. PubMed ID: 3463953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [Tensor analysis in orthodontic x-ray cephalometric diagnosis. A further development of the methods]. Järvinen S Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1987; 75(5):445-50. PubMed ID: 2962400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]