These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

830 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6589731)

  • 1. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
    Hällgren M; Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
    Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands.
    van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 18569107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults.
    Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 6719016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise.
    Ozimek E; Kutzner D; Sek A; Wicher A
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):433-43. PubMed ID: 19925330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest variability in testing hearing of speech.
    Hughes EC; Arthur RH; Johnson RL
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 511653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):729-41. PubMed ID: 19626512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.