These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Improved electrode for electroretinography. Dawson WW; Trick GL; Litzkow CA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1979 Sep; 18(9):988-91. PubMed ID: 478786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electroretinographic wet electrode. Carpi F; Benini G; Tomei F; Figliuzzi RM; De Napoli A Med Eng Phys; 2009 Oct; 31(8):923-9. PubMed ID: 19501539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes. Beeler P; Barthelmes D; Sutter FK; Helbig H; Fleischhauer JC Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 17458789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The visually evoked subcortical potential: is related to the electroretinogram? Rubinstein MP; Harding GF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1981 Aug; 21(2):335-44. PubMed ID: 7251311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The repeatability and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrodes. Mohidin N; Yap MK; Jacobs RJ Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Nov; 17(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 9666928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electroretinography with noncorneal and corneal electrodes. Giltrow-Tyler JF; Crews SJ; Drasdo N Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1978 Nov; 17(11):1124-7. PubMed ID: 700963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The DTL ERG electrode comes in different shapes and sizes: Are they all good? Woo J; Jung S; Gauvin M; Lachapelle P Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 135(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 28741115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Circadian rhythm of human electroretinogram. Nozaki S; Wakakura M; Ishikawa S Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1983; 27(2):346-52. PubMed ID: 6620718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and efficacy evaluation of a new ERG electrode (the LVP electrode) part II. Flash ERG pilot study. Mohan Ram LS; Jalali S; Faheemuddin S; Das T; Nutheti R Doc Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 107(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 14661908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The inverse problem in electroretinography: a study based on skin potentials and a realistic geometry model. van Schijndel NH; Thijssen JM; Oostendorp TF; Cuypers MH; Huiskamp GJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Feb; 44(2):209-11. PubMed ID: 9214801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new universal electrode for ERG recording. Trau R; van den Bergh L; Zeyen T Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1989; 231():117-21. PubMed ID: 2488444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design of a new disposable ERG electrode. Hiroi K; Miyake M; Hashimoto T; Honda Y Ophthalmologica; 1995; 209(6):299-301. PubMed ID: 8751335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Skin electrodes for electroretinography in unsedated children]. Baier C; Krastel H; Schapp O; Alexandridis E Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 8963144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An improved electrode for electroretinography: design and standardization. Cummings RW; Kaluzne SJ Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1978 Oct; 55(10):719-24. PubMed ID: 747197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scleral contact lens electrodes for electroretinography in domesticated animals. Witzel DA; Johnson JH; Pitts DG; Smith EL Am J Vet Res; 1976 Aug; 37(8):983-5. PubMed ID: 949126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]