These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6591299)

  • 21. Problems of intra-canal testing of endodontic materials.
    Rowe AH
    Int Endod J; 1980 May; 13(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 7005107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tissue response to potential root-end filling materials in infected root canals.
    Chong BS; Ford TR; Kariyawasam SP
    Int Endod J; 1997 Mar; 30(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 10332244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sealer selection: a considered approach.
    Whitworth J
    Endod Prac; 1999 Jun; 2(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 10740481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of sealing capabilities of amalgum, GIC and zinc oxide eugenol cement when used as retro grade filling materials (in vitro study).
    Ansari SR; Qayyum Z; Khitab U
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2003; 15(3):43-6. PubMed ID: 14727340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Time-dependence of coronal seal of temporary materials used in endodontics.
    Madarati A; Rekab MS; Watts DC; Qualtrough A
    Aust Endod J; 2008 Dec; 34(3):89-93. PubMed ID: 19032641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Action and speed of reabsorption of distinct root canal filling materials in the periapical connective tissue].
    Holland R; Maisto OA; de Souza V; Maresca BM; Nery MJ
    Rev Asoc Odontol Argent; 1981; 69(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 6943612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Study on the sealing capability of a calcium phosphate root canal filling material].
    Dai H; Yan Y; Cao X; Li S; Jia L; Dong W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 19(4):552-5, 558. PubMed ID: 12561344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative evaluation of apical linear dye penetration of Glass ionomer based sealers with conventional root canal sealers. An in vitro study.
    Rajesh P; Kamath MP; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2000; 11(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11307247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal adaptation of root-end filling materials: an in vitro study with teeth and replicas.
    Costa AT; Konrath F; Dedavid B; Weber JB; de Oliveira MG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 19279975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ion release characteristics, precipitate formation and sealing ability of a phosphate glass-polycaprolactone-based composite for use as a root canal obturation material.
    Alani A; Knowles JC; Chrzanowski W; Ng YL; Gulabivala K
    Dent Mater; 2009 Mar; 25(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 19100612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Antibacterial effects of resinous retrograde root filling materials.
    Lai CC; Huang FM; Chan Y; Yang HW; Huang MS; Chou MY; Chang YC
    J Endod; 2003 Feb; 29(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 12597711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro antibacterial activity of a glass ionomer endodontic sealer.
    Shalhav M; Fuss Z; Weiss EI
    J Endod; 1997 Oct; 23(10):616-9. PubMed ID: 9587273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Biological and materials-testing studies of different filling materials in animal experiments with retrograde root filling].
    Neugebauer W; Albers HK; Bull HG
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1981 Apr; 36(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 6944188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative evaluation of strength of various core restorative materials for endodontically treated anterior teeth.
    Dabas VK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2000; 11(4):139-44. PubMed ID: 11307637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Development of study on modified glass ionomer cement].
    Ba X; Cheng W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 22(4):857-9. PubMed ID: 16156290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the effects of two kinds of glass-ionomer cement on human gingival fibroblast attachment, proliferation and morphology in vitro.
    Yan F; Xiao Y; Li H; Haase H; Bartold PM
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2000 Jan; 2(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 12666981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of luting cements for minimally retentive crown preparations.
    Browning WD; Nelson SK; Cibirka R; Myers ML
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb; 33(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 11890033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative study of sealing ability of two root-end-filling materials with and without the use of dentin-bonding agents.
    Economides N; Kokorikos I; Gogos C; Kolokouris I; Staurianos C
    J Endod; 2004 Jan; 30(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 14760905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Experimental studies of biocompatibility of various materials for root fillings from the point of view of methodology and histopathology].
    Kvasnicka J; Dobiás J
    Cesk Stomatol; 1980 Jan; 80(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 6928800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sealing ability of five different retrograde filling materials.
    Gerhards F; Wagner W
    J Endod; 1996 Sep; 22(9):463-6. PubMed ID: 9198426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.