These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6592339)

  • 1. Cranial implant modification.
    Martin JW; Ganz SD; King GE; Jacob RF; Kramer DC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Sep; 52(3):414-6. PubMed ID: 6592339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resin sealant: a new method of methyl methacrylate cranioplasty. Technical note.
    Yanai A
    J Neurosurg; 1991 Aug; 75(2):328-30. PubMed ID: 2072176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acrylic cranial implant: an alternative vector in management of cranial defect.
    Koli DK; Nanda A; Verma M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e591-4. PubMed ID: 23172488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of visible light-cured resin system in maxillofacial prosthetics and neuro-orthopedic surgery.
    Alsawaf MM; Segal R; Tabatabai A; McKinstry RE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 1800735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Alternate Vista in Rehabilitation of Cranial Defects: Combining Digital and Manual Techniques to Fabricate a Hybrid Cranioplast.
    Kaur H; Nanda A; Koli D; Verma M; Singh H; Bishnoi I; Pathak P; Gupta A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):1313-5. PubMed ID: 26080183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A technique for fabrication of cranial prostheses using high-temperature vulcanizing silicone material.
    Kharade P; Dholam K; Gorakh A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):113-115. PubMed ID: 28024824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of highly cross-linked autopolymerizing reline acrylic resins.
    Arima T; Murata H; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jan; 73(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 7699601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current concepts in cranioplasty.
    Beumer J; Firtell DN; Curtis TA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Jul; 42(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 379310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of heat transfer to the implant-bone interface related to exothermic heat generation during setting of autopolymerizing acrylic resins applied directly to an implant abutment.
    Ormianer Z; Laufer BZ; Nissan J; Gross M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):837-42. PubMed ID: 11151583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of steam autoclave sterilization on methyl methacrylate cranial implant materials.
    Jacob RF; Collard SM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 1811628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strengths of two different gingiva-colored materials bonded to commercially pure titanium and acrylic artificial teeth.
    Elzarug YA; Galburt RB; Ali A; Finkelman M; Dam HG
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 24521462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty in children: long-term results.
    Blum KS; Schneider SJ; Rosenthal AD
    Pediatr Neurosurg; 1997 Jan; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 9361115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wetting the repair surface with methyl methacrylate affects the transverse strength of repaired heat-polymerized resin.
    Vallittu PK; Lassila VP; Lappalainen R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 7853262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel economically viable solution for 3D printing-assisted cranioplast fabrication.
    Lal B; Ghosh M; Agarwal B; Gupta D; Roychoudhury A
    Br J Neurosurg; 2020 Jun; 34(3):280-283. PubMed ID: 32075447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technique for cranioplasty prosthesis fabrication.
    Jordan RD; White JT; Schupper N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Aug; 40(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 278842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acrylic cranioplasty with alginate molding: technical note.
    Yamamoto Y; Mendel E; Raffel C
    Neurosurgery; 1997 Jul; 41(1):305-6; discussion 306-9. PubMed ID: 9218324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniofacial contouring and porous acrylic cement.
    Vaandrager JM; van Mullem PJ; de Wijn JR
    Ann Plast Surg; 1988 Dec; 21(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 3239937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
    Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loss into water of residual monomer from autopolymerizing dental acrylic resin.
    Lamb DJ; Ellis B; Priestley D
    Biomaterials; 1982 Jul; 3(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 7115859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.