90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 659290)
1. Quality judgments of hearing aid-processed speech and music by normal and otopathologic listeners.
Punch JL
J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 659290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-frequency amplification and sound quality in listeners with normal through moderate hearing loss.
Ricketts TA; Dittberner AB; Johnson EE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):160-72. PubMed ID: 18230863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
Yund EW; Simon HJ; Efron R
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
Narendran MM; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Harvey LO
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1150-64. PubMed ID: 17672661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multidimensional scaling of quality judgments of speech signals processed by hearing aids.
Punch JL; Montgomery AA; Schwartz DM; Walden BE; Prosek RA; Howard MT
J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Aug; 68(2):458-66. PubMed ID: 7419804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
Purdy SC; Pavlovic CV
Audiology; 1992; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spectral weighting strategies for hearing-impaired listeners measured using a correlational method.
Calandruccio L; Doherty KA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2367-78. PubMed ID: 18397039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
Chung K; Killion MC; Christensen LA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility.
Jenstad LM; Souza PE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):651-67. PubMed ID: 16197279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
Eadie TL; Baylor CR
J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
