BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 659293)

  • 1. Comparison of pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of young normal-hearing children.
    Orchik DJ; Rintelmann WF
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):214-20. PubMed ID: 659293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of audiometric configuration on pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing losses.
    Stephens MM; Rintelmann WF
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 659294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aided and unaided narrow band noise thresholds in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Garstecki DC; Bode DL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 931761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Narrow band noise audiometry: the effect of filter slope.
    Orchik DJ; Mosher NL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 1232074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort level: relationships in children with profound hearing losses.
    Holmes DW; Woodford CM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(6):193-6. PubMed ID: 893187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative efficiency of warbled-tone and conventional pure-tone testing with children.
    Robinson DO; Vaughn CR
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):252-7. PubMed ID: 931760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [What average hearing gains can be expected at present with children wearing hearing aids?].
    Kruse E
    HNO; 1985 Oct; 33(10):463-7. PubMed ID: 4066421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of noise bands on contralateral pure tone adaptation.
    Meyer RC; Schubert GW; Holzwarth HR
    Laryngoscope; 1975 Aug; 85(8):1367-73. PubMed ID: 1160467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comfortable loudness judgments for discrete frequency signals.
    Berger KW; Harrison LD; Monack N; Ferren GE
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 7345058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory characteristics of children with autism.
    Tharpe AM; Bess FH; Sladen DP; Schissel H; Couch S; Schery T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):430-41. PubMed ID: 16825892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of ambient acoustic noise on the auditory steady-state response thresholds in normally hearing adults.
    Kei J; Smith D; Joseph S; Stopa J; Kang S; Darnell R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17715465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population.
    Blanchet C; Pommie C; Mondain M; Berr C; Hillaire D; Puel JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 18520580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of warble-tone frequency deviation on threshold measurement in cases with sloping audiometric configurations.
    Lundeen C
    J Aud Res; 1987 Jan; 27(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 3448067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference hearing threshold levels for short duration signals.
    Poulsen T; Legarth SV
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Oct; 47(10):665-74. PubMed ID: 18923987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Age-related aspects of pure tone threshold in extended band by air].
    Levina IuV; Kunel'skaia NL; Ivanets IV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2003; (2):12-3. PubMed ID: 12958852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation and test-retest reliability of the IHR-McCormick Automated Toy Discrimination Test.
    Summerfield Q; Palmer AR; Foster JR; Marshall DH; Twomey T
    Br J Audiol; 1994 Jun; 28(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 7841901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
    Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.