These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6593083)
1. A comparison of the effects of two different prophylaxis regimes in vitro on some restorative dental materials. A preliminary SEM study. Patterson CJ; McLundie AC Br Dent J; 1984 Sep; 157(5):166-70. PubMed ID: 6593083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques. Faria-Júnior ÉM; Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Contreras EF; Lopes MB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [S.E.M. study of the in vitro effects of a prophylaxis device (Cavijet) on tissue surfaces and dental restorative materials]. Le May O; Kaqueler JC J Parodontol; 1985 Apr; 4(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 3861853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of a paste-free prophylaxis polishing cup and various prophylaxis polishing pastes on tooth enamel and restorative materials. Covey DA; Barnes C; Watanabe H; Johnson WW Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):466-73; quiz 474-5. PubMed ID: 22313918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptation of resin restorative materials to etched enamel and the interfacial work of fracture. McCabe JF; Storer R Br Dent J; 1980 Mar; 148(6):155-9. PubMed ID: 6987995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Aerosol-jet device for plaque removal. A clinical and scanning electron microscopy study]. de Boever JA; Vande Velde F Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Jul; 40(7):725-9. PubMed ID: 3868580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of various stripping techniques on surface enamel. Lucchese A; Porcù F; Dolci F J Clin Orthod; 2001 Nov; 35(11):691-5. PubMed ID: 11803666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [New means of prophylaxis and polishing. Ultrastructural analysis of the enamel surface]. Scotti R; Morabito A; Vergano V; Benech A Minerva Stomatol; 1985; 34(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 3858647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro study comparing finishing technics of composite resins and their effects on the surrounding enamel. Pellett C J Nebr Dent Assoc; 1979; 56(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 297130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of enamel preparation on the tensile bond strength of orthodontic composite resin. Gerbo LR; Lacefield WR; Wells BR; Russell CM Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(4):275-81; discussion 282. PubMed ID: 1333734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification and management of restorative dental materials during patient prophylaxis. Krouse M; Gladwin SC Dent Hyg (Chic); 1984 Oct; 58(10):456-61. PubMed ID: 6593240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The surface roughness of restorative materials and dental tissues after polishing with prophylaxis and polishing pastes. Roulet JF; Roulet-Mehrens TK J Periodontol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 6951995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]