These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6594933)
1. A method of cephalometric evaluation. McNamara JA Am J Orthod; 1984 Dec; 86(6):449-69. PubMed ID: 6594933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The proportionate template as a diagnostic aid. Jacobson A Am J Orthod; 1979 Feb; 75(2):156-72. PubMed ID: 283701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric analysis using a template. Liebgott B Angle Orthod; 1978 Jul; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 280127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalometric considerations of the upper protrusion treatment cases by the edgewise method. Nakakuki M J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1972 Sep; 14(3):89-96. PubMed ID: 4509825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cephalometric appraisal of dentoskeletal pattern in mentally retarded children. Khiaram I Angle Orthod; 1977 Apr; 47(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 266383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cephalometric norms of a Burkina Faso population. Ouédraogo Y; Benyahia H; Diouf JS; Camara T; Bationo R; Ngom PI Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 30772356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heavy intermittent cervical traction in class II treatment: a longitudinal cephalometric assessment. Mills CM; Holman RG; Graber TM Am J Orthod; 1978 Oct; 74(4):361-79. PubMed ID: 281139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The stability of the lower labial segment following surgical correction of Class III skeletal discrepancy. Neal JJ; West CR; Lovius BB Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 Jun; 26(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 3165016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cephalometric grid analysis of changes produced in facial morphology by different orthodontic technics]. Palot C Orthod Fr; 1980; 51():1-124. PubMed ID: 6941151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The quadrilateral analysis: a differential diagnosis for surgical orthodontics. Di Paolo RJ; Philip C; Maganzini AL; Hirce JD Am J Orthod; 1984 Dec; 86(6):470-82. PubMed ID: 6594934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cephalometric norms for the Chinese: a compilation of existing data. Moate SJ; Darendeliler MA Aust Orthod J; 2002 Mar; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 12502125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A cephalometric study of the pterygoid process during growth]. Harnet JC; Kahn JL; Bacon W; Sick H Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1995; 96(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7732322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cephalometric values for adult Mexican-Americans. Swlerenga D; Oesterle LJ; Messersmith ML Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 8059750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new approach to cephalometric analysis of the dental base relationship. Johnson JS Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 272128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cephalometric comparison between class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion. Godiawala RN; Joshi MR Angle Orthod; 1974 Jul; 44(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 4527603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]