These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 659657)

  • 1. The effect of selected prosodic errors on the intelligibility of deaf speech.
    Parkhurst BG; Levitt H
    J Commun Disord; 1978 Apr; 11(2-3):249-56. PubMed ID: 659657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children.
    Smith CR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Dec; 18(4):795-811. PubMed ID: 1207108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitch deviancy and intelligibility of deaf speech.
    McGarr NS; Osberger NJ
    J Commun Disord; 1978 Apr; 11(2-3):237-47. PubMed ID: 659656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of timing errors on the intelligibility of deaf children's speech.
    Osberger MJ; Levitt H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Nov; 66(5):1316-24. PubMed ID: 500969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech intelligibility of deaf speakers and distinctive feature usage.
    Mencke EO; Ochsner GJ; Testut EW
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jan; 24(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 6543865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of segmental and suprasegmental corrections on the intelligibility of deaf speech.
    Maassen B; Povel DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Sep; 78(3):877-86. PubMed ID: 4031258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acquisition of the voicing distinction by profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Gulian E; Hinds P; Fallside F; Keiller C
    Br J Audiol; 1983 Nov; 17(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 6199065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acquisition of frication by severely hearing-impaired children.
    Gulian E; Fallside F; Hinds P; Keiller C
    Br J Audiol; 1983 Nov; 17(4):219-31. PubMed ID: 6199064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marking word boundaries to improve the intelligibility of the speech of the deaf.
    Maassen B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 3724115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Assessment of speech and linguistic disorders in patients with cochlear implant--preliminary results].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Moskal D; Kasperuk J; Falkowski D; Rutkowski R
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2010 Sep; 29(171):187-93. PubMed ID: 20931830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The structure of segmental errors in the speech of deaf children.
    Levitt H; Stromberg H; Smith C; Gold T
    J Commun Disord; 1980 Dec; 13(6):419-41. PubMed ID: 7451672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences between read and spontaneous speech of deaf children.
    Smith CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1304-6. PubMed ID: 7142586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Syllabic complexity and its relation to speech intelligibility in a deaf population.
    Porter KA; Dickerson MV
    Am Ann Deaf; 1986 Mar; 131(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 3716958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationships between speech intelligibility and word articulation scores in children with hearing loss.
    Ertmer DJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1075-86. PubMed ID: 20220022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Second formant transitions of selected consonant-vowel combinations in the speech of deaf and normal-hearing children.
    Monsen RB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Jun; 19(2):279-89. PubMed ID: 979202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The speech of deaf and partially-hearing children with special reference to factors affecting intelligibility.
    Markides A
    Br J Disord Commun; 1970 Oct; 5(2):126-40. PubMed ID: 5495165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Articulation patterns and speech intelligibility of 54 Vietnamese children with unoperated oral clefts: clinical observations and impressions.
    Landis P; Thi-Thu-Cuc P
    Cleft Palate J; 1975 Apr; 12():234-43. PubMed ID: 1054630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech quality evaluation using "phoneme-specific" sentences.
    Huggins AW; Nickerson RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 May; 77(5):1896-906. PubMed ID: 3998299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of correcting fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of deaf speech and its interaction with temporal aspects.
    Maassen B; Povel DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Dec; 76(6):1673-81. PubMed ID: 6520305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of terminal fall contours in speech produced by deaf persons.
    Rubin-Spitz J; McGarr NS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):174-80. PubMed ID: 2314077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.