BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6596847)

  • 1. Clinical results using a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Dowell RC; Webb RL; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():230-6. PubMed ID: 6596847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Dowell RC; Martin LF; Clark GM; Brown AM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985; 94(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 3160295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical trial of a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis. An initial study in four patients with profound total hearing loss.
    Clark GM; Dowell RC; Brown AM; Luscombe SM; Pyman BC; Webb RL; Bailey QR; Seligman PM; Tong YC
    Med J Aust; 1983 Oct; 2(9):430-3. PubMed ID: 6355794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical trials with a 22-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Shapiro WH
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Dec; 95(12):1448-54. PubMed ID: 3906323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. UCH/RNID single channel extracochlear implant: results in thirty profoundly deafened adults.
    Cooper HR; Carpenter L; Aleksy W; Booth CL; Read TE; Graham JM; Fraser JG
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 18():22-38. PubMed ID: 2607192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implant hearing performance at the University of Minnesota.
    Kimberley BP; Lee A; Scheller L; Levine S; Adams G; Nelson DA
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2921782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
    Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical results of the French multichannel cochlear implant.
    Fugain C; Meyer B; Chabolle F; Chouard CH
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():237-46. PubMed ID: 6596848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subjective benefits reported by adult Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant users.
    Kou BS; Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 8170029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary assessment of the Los Angeles, Vienna and Melbourne cochlear implants.
    McCabe BF; Tyler RS; Gantz BJ; Lowder MW; Otto SR; Preece JP
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():247-53. PubMed ID: 6596849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The University of California, San Francisco/Storz cochlear implant program.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda J
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):287-305. PubMed ID: 3520442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open-set speech perception in congenitally deaf children using cochlear implants.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Gomolin RH; Green JE; Shapiro WH; Hoffman RA; Roland JT
    Am J Otol; 1997 May; 18(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 9149829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tone perception of Mandarin-speaking postlingually deaf implantees using the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Mini System.
    Huang TS; Wang NM; Liu SY
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():294-8. PubMed ID: 7668677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of prelingually and perilingually deafened children and adults with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    García JM; Barón de Otero C; García J; Peñaranda A; Niño C; Campos S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nucleus 22-channel cochlear mini-system implantations in Mandarin-speaking patients.
    Huang TS; Wang NM; Liu SY
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8694134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of connected speech without lipreading, using a multi-channel hearing prosthesis.
    Dowell RC; Clark GM; Seligman PM; Brown AM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1986; 102(1-2):7-11. PubMed ID: 3755563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre-implant evaluation of speech and hearing.
    Abel SM; Tse SM
    J Otolaryngol; 1987 Oct; 16(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 3682048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient performance over eighteen months with the Ineraid intracochlear implant.
    Gray RF; Quinn SJ; Court I; Vanat Z; Baguley DM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():275-7. PubMed ID: 7668667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.