These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6598739)
1. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite in Class II restorations in primary molars: one-year results. García-Godoy F Acta Odontol Pediatr; 1984 Jun; 5(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 6598739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A thirty months clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin in primary molars. Cunha RF J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 11314318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars. Tonn EM; Ryge G; Chambers DW ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 7002965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Composite restorations for primary molars: two-year results. Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC Pediatr Dent; 1985 Jun; 7(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 3859848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a two-year follow-up. Leifler E; Varpio M ASDC J Dent Child; 1981; 48(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 6946081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of composite resin tunnel restorations on primary molars. de Freitas AR; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; de Sousa CN Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 7938431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars. Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months. Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results. Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation. Andersson-Wenckert I; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Class II Vitremer restoration of primary molars. Croll TP; Helpin ML ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 7775678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [ART or conventional restorations? A final evaluation of proximal restorations in deciduous molars]. van den Dungen GM; Huddleston Slater AE; van Amerongen WE Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Sep; 111(9):345-9. PubMed ID: 15495501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Materials and techniques for restoration of primary molars by pediatric dentists in Florida. Guelmann M; Mjör IA Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 12212875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [New temporary filling procedures for Class II inlay restorations using composite resins in the primary molars]. Goto G; Taguchi T Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1985; 23(3):753-9. PubMed ID: 3869316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]