These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6599088)
1. [Matrix for restoration of the distal lingual fissure of the 1st maxillary molar]. Theodoridou-Pachini S Hell Stomatol Chron; 1984; 28(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 6599088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Matrices in conservative dentistry. Application of matrices for amalgam in critical zones]. Garcia Barbero J; Lopez Calvo JA; Carlos de la Macorra J Rev Esp Estomatol; 1983; 31(5):325-36. PubMed ID: 6589692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a new matrix band and wedge for amalgam preparations having lingual or facial extensions. Ireland EJ Gen Dent; 1985; 33(5):434-5. PubMed ID: 3865863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Using the separator for a Class 3 composite resin. Beamish LW Oper Dent; 1983; 8(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 6583664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pre-contoured matrix bands for Class II amalgam restorations. Graham DA; Daniels JA; Kahl EA; Pelzner RB; Birtcil RF Gen Dent; 1980; 28(3):52-7. PubMed ID: 6936329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Matrices in conservative dentistry. Qualities of matrices for amalgam]. Garcia Barbero J; Lopez Calvo JA; Carlos de la Macorra J Rev Esp Estomatol; 1983; 31(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 6578550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior composite resin restorations. Part 3. Matrix systems. van der Vyver PJ SADJ; 2002 Jun; 57(6):221-6. PubMed ID: 12229077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The elusive tight contact with composite restorations. How to achieve it. Karst LE Dent Today; 2003 Nov; 22(11):76-9. PubMed ID: 14650341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Selecting a matrix for a Class II amalgam restoration. Kaplan I; Schuman NJ J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jul; 56(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 3459877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Devices for overcoming technical difficulties in applying matrices for conservative dentistry. Bow P Diastema; 1978; 6():13-7. PubMed ID: 296093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A matrix system for class II amalgam restorations in primary molars. Gustafsson U; Magnusson B Swed Dent J; 1977; 1(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 268686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro study on the use of circumferential matrix bands in the placement of Class II amalgam restorations. Gilmour AS; James T; Bryant S; Gardner A; Stone D; Addy LD Br Dent J; 2008 Mar; 204(6):E10; discussion 310-1. PubMed ID: 18297049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Matrices in conservative dentistry. Classification and description for amalgams according to the anchorage system]. Garcia Barbero J; Lopez Calvo JA; de la Macorra JC Rev Esp Estomatol; 1983; 31(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 6587487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Inadvertent deformation of amalgam matrices. Meyer A Gen Dent; 1978; 26(4):51-3. PubMed ID: 292610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservative amalgam restoration of Class II lesions--the "slot" restoration: a case report. Oddera M Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):493-8. PubMed ID: 7991771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A modified copper band matrix technique for large amalgam restorations. Gordon M; Imber S; Ben-Amar A Quintessence Int; 1985 Mar; 16(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 3857669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Laser-assisted amalgam removal with no local anesthetic. Scott A Dent Today; 2003 Jul; 22(7):76-9. PubMed ID: 12901050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]