These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6599258)
1. [Scanning electron microscopy evaluation after 2 years of a posterior composite: a possible amalgam substitute?]. Pierleoni P; Pagavino G Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1984; 25(1):151-61. PubMed ID: 6599258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and SEM study of Tetric resin composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. Krejci I; Besek M; Lutz F Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 9115675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A new technic for filling the posterior teeth]. de Mar P; Gatti C; Santarelli G; Strohmenger L Mondo Odontostomatol; 1986; 28(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 3526121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Preliminary research on the scanning electron microscope. Note 2. Tooth-filling interface study]. Pierleoni P; Pasquinelli P Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1979; 20(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 394711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A high-density posterior composite used for an amalgam replacement. Adams TC Dent Today; 1999 Feb; 18(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10765814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical studies aimed at evaluating the composite restorative material Evicrol, in place from 2 to 3 years]. Buth K; Janik G; Janik G; Klinke G Stomatol DDR; 1982 Feb; 32(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 6956030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of different composite finishing methods. Hietanen J; Rantanen AV Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1976 Feb; 72(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 1257237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years. Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Geometric structure of composite surfaces. I. Effect of rotary instruments on preparing composite surfaces--scanning electron microscopy studies (SEM)]. Suliborski S Protet Stomatol; 1980; 30(6):319-28. PubMed ID: 6949190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of occlusion on the degradation of posterior composite resins. Leinfelder KF; Small B Dent Today; 1998 Nov; 17(11):44-50. PubMed ID: 10752417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Identification of P10, a composite resin for posterior restorations]. Gatti A; Amadori L Dent Cadmos; 1985 Feb; 53(3):63, 65, 68-70. PubMed ID: 3860420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study. Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [5-year clinical study of UV-cured composites in the posterior region]. Wilder AD; May KN; Leinfelder KF Phillip J Restaur Zahnmed; 1985; 2(9 Spec No):259-63. PubMed ID: 3006150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]