These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6599548)
1. Cephalometric evaluation of the dentofacial complex of Thai adults. Suchato W; Chaiwat J J Dent Assoc Thai; 1984; 34(5):233-43. PubMed ID: 6599548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cephalometric analysis of a group Cape coloureds. Seedat AK J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1983 Nov; 38(11):673-5. PubMed ID: 6586002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric study of the dentofacial complex of North Indians. Nanda R; Nanda RS Angle Orthod; 1969 Jan; 39(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 5250522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Racial comparison of dento-skeleto-facial patterns of adults from Kerala with Caucasians, Chinese, Japanese and Negroes. Ashima V; John KK J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1992 Sep; 6(3):80-9. PubMed ID: 1344286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Racial comparison of dentofacial cephalometric norms using Steiner's analysis. Valiathan A J Indian Orthod Soc; 1979; 11(1-2):8-11. PubMed ID: 297159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of cephalometric norms for the African Bantu and a caucasoid population. Bacon W; Girardin P; Turlot JC Eur J Orthod; 1983 Aug; 5(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 6578046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. Alcalde RE; Jinno T; Pogrel MA; Matsumura T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 56(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 9461133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cephalometric study of tooth position as related to facial structure in profiles of human beings: a comparison of Japanese (Oriental) and American (Caucasian) adults. Reitz PV; Aoki H; Yoshioka M; Uehara J; Kubota Y J Prosthet Dent; 1973 Feb; 29(21):157-66. PubMed ID: 4509355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Longitudinal observation on the metric characters of the face in Japanese-American hybrids with special reference to the genetic relation between hybrids and their parental populations. Hoshi H Hum Biol; 1973 Sep; 45(3):403-22. PubMed ID: 4750409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative study of dentofacial relations with the soft tissue profile]. Valente A; de Araujo EP; Thomazinho A; de Jesus Nunes L Rev Fac Farm Odontol Ribeiro Preto; 1982; 19(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 6964939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalometric comparison of clinical norms between the Japanese and Caucasians. Nezu H; Nagata K; Yoshida Y; Kosaka H; Kikuchi M Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 Sep; 41(3):450-65. PubMed ID: 6958769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A cephalometric appraisal of dento-facial and soft tissue pattern in Indo-Aryans. Grewal H; Sidhu SS; Kharbanda OP J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1994 Sep; 8(3):87-96. PubMed ID: 9791249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An anthropometric study of northeastern Brazilians. Eveleth PB Am J Phys Anthropol; 1972 Sep; 37(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 5085496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. Alcalde RE; Jinno T; Orsini MG; Sasaki A; Sugiyama RM; Matsumura T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 10893477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Roentgen cephalometric study on craniums of Formosan and Japanese adults. 2. Standard values for various cephalometric analysis (author's transl)]. Lin JK Shikwa Gakuho; 1978 Jun; 78(6):951-9. PubMed ID: 297342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles. Lew KK; Ho KK; Keng SB; Ho KH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Nov; 50(11):1184-9; discussion 1189-90. PubMed ID: 1403274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cephalometric study of Korean adults. Park IC; Bowman D; Klapper L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Jul; 96(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 2750721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric features of Filipinos with Angle Class I occlusion according to the Munich analysis. Naranjilla MA; Rudzki-Janson I Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 15747817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of southern Chinese and British Caucasian cephalometric standards. Cooke MS; Wei SH Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 2729666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]