These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6599579)

  • 1. [Fracture toughness of posterior composite resin restorative materials].
    Yoshimoto S
    Kanagawa Shigaku; 1984 Jun; 19(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 6599579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture toughness of posterior resin composites.
    Bonilla ED; Mardirossian G; Caputo AA
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 12066660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A rational use of dental materials in posterior direct resin restorations in order to control polymerization shrinkage stress.
    Giachetti L; Bertini F; Bambi C; Scaminaci Russo D
    Minerva Stomatol; 2007 Mar; 56(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 17327817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro investigation of marginal leakage using two composite resin restorative systems.
    Martin DW
    J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1980 Mar; 8(3):41-6. PubMed ID: 7005244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of mode of fracture of adhesive restorative materials. An invitro study.
    Nayak UA; Suasha P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 12420578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites.
    Watanabe H; Khera SC; Vargas MA; Qian F
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):418-25. PubMed ID: 17697707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance.
    Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique.
    Lutz E; Krejci I; Oldenburg TR
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Dec; 17(12):777-84. PubMed ID: 3468527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations.
    Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can a single composite resin serve all purposes?
    Roeters JJ; Shortall AC; Opdam NJ
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(2):73-9; quiz 114. PubMed ID: 16041332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strain profiles in molars restored with posterior composite resins: effect of cavity size & restorative technique.
    Kamel FM; Bides MW; Leinfelder KF
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1327-33. PubMed ID: 9497677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Studies on the dynamic durability of dental restorative materials. (Part 2) Properties for the repeated impact compressive load ot composite resins (author's transl)].
    Kondo S; Okawa S; Ota M
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1980 Oct; 21(56):253-62. PubMed ID: 6940930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing stress with composite resin, Part 1: The restorative-tooth interface.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
    Dent Today; 2006 Dec; 25(12):98, 100-4; quiz 104. PubMed ID: 17193798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.
    Ohlmann B; Gruber R; Eickemeyer G; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18762033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoration of posterior teeth with composite resin. 1: Direct-placement composite.
    Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
    Dent Update; 1996 Dec; 23(10):406-10. PubMed ID: 9610271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On material choice and fracture susceptibility of restored teeth: an asymptotic stress analysis approach.
    Kahler B; Kotousov A; Melkoumian N
    Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1109-14. PubMed ID: 16375962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.