These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6599593)

  • 1. [Mechanical properties of posterior composite resins in relation to marginal fracture in restorations].
    Sawa E; Nakajima N; Aono T; Suzuki J; Maekawa A; Kubota A; Hanaoka K; Sugisaki S; Simamura Y; Iwamoto T
    Kanagawa Shigaku; 1984 Dec; 19(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 6599593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Physical properties on posterior restorative composite resins of various consistencies].
    Sugiyama H; Murakami A; Uesugi S; Miura M; Kikuchi S
    Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1986; 24(4):633-42. PubMed ID: 3505065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of fracture toughness and fracture strength in posterior restorative materials.
    Lloyd CH; Adamson M
    Dent Mater; 1987 Oct; 3(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 3479357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physical and mechanical properties of particulate composite developed for dental filling applications.
    Pavithran C; Prasad GP; Rohtagi PK
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1984 Apr; 56(4):149-52. PubMed ID: 6098615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New amine accelerators for composite restorative resins.
    Brauer GM; Dulik DM; Antonucci JM; Termini DJ; Argentar H
    J Dent Res; 1979 Oct; 58(10):1994-2000. PubMed ID: 291623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct restorative resins-a comparative study.
    Swartz ML; Moore BK; Phillips RW; Rhodes BF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Feb; 47(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 6948954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, and marginal dimensional stability.
    Wendt SL
    Quintessence Int; 1987 Apr; 18(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 3472260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in the physical properties of composite dental restoratives. Suggested causes and clinical effects.
    Lee HL; Orlowski JA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1977 Jul; 4(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 268418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of the mechanical lifetime of dental restorations: method and preliminary results.
    van der Varst PG; Lemmens PL; Peters MC; Plasschaert AJ
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 2050709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of clinical wear of restorative dental composite materials.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1993; 3(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 8193568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional and aesthetic guidelines for stress-reduced direct posterior composite restorations.
    Deliperi S
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 22816500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increasing the resistance of teeth to fracture: bonded composite resin versus glass ionomer cement.
    Eakle WS
    Dent Mater; 1985 Dec; 1(6):229-30. PubMed ID: 3913610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Current state of composite resins as restorative materials].
    Navajas Rodriguez de Mondelo J
    Rev Esp Estomatol; 1983; 31(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 6374787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical gap formation in class II composite resin restorations.
    Ehrnford L; Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 6372145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional and microfilled composite resins. Part II. Chip fractures.
    Lambrechts P; Ameye C; Vanherle G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Nov; 48(5):527-38. PubMed ID: 6958862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Kuijs RH
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 18621458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microstructure of posterior restorations of composite resin after clinical wear.
    O'Brien WJ; Yee J
    Oper Dent; 1980; 5(3):90-4. PubMed ID: 6940105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loss of substance of dental composite restorations.
    Vrijhoef MM; Hendriks FH; Letzel H
    Dent Mater; 1985 Jun; 1(3):101-5. PubMed ID: 3861433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Physicomechanical nature of composite resins used for filling and abutment building].
    Masuhara E
    Nihon Shika Ishikai Zasshi; 1981; 34(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 7028892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.