These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6600294)

  • 1. Reproducibility and consistency in classification of breast parenchymal patterns.
    Carlile T; Thompson DJ; Kopecky KJ; Gilbert FI; Krook PM; Present AJ; Russell HW; Threatt BA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jan; 140(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 6600294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patterns of breast parenchyma on mammography.
    Rideout DF; Poon PY
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1977 Dec; 28(4):257-8. PubMed ID: 925065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Observer variation in the classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns.
    Boyd NF; Wolfson C; Moskowitz M; Carlile T; Petitclerc C; Ferri HA; Fishell E; Gregoire A; Kiernan M; Longley JD
    J Chronic Dis; 1986; 39(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 3711253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Tabár classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns.
    Gram IT; Funkhouser E; Tabár L
    Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 9097055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer prediction and the Wolfe classification of mammograms.
    Carlile T; Kopecky KJ; Thompson DJ; Whitehead JR; Gilbert FI; Present AJ; Threatt BA; Krook P; Hadaway E
    JAMA; 1985 Aug 23-30; 254(8):1050-3. PubMed ID: 4021043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns.
    Tahoces PG; Correa J; Souto M; Gómez L; Vidal JJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jan; 40(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 7708834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density.
    Gao J; Warren R; Warren-Forward H; Forbes JF
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Mar; 108(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 17616811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation between breast parenchymal patterns and mammographers' certainty of diagnosis.
    Fajardo LL; Hillman BJ; Frey C
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Jul; 23(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 3170137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A demonstration comparing film mammography with the new high sensitivity xeromammography.
    Martin JE
    Radiographics; 1989 Jan; 9(1):153-68. PubMed ID: 2913617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension.
    Caldwell CB; Stapleton SJ; Holdsworth DW; Jong RA; Weiser WJ; Cooke G; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1990 Feb; 35(2):235-47. PubMed ID: 2315379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as risk indicators for incident cancer in a screening program: an extended analysis.
    Krook PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Dec; 131(6):1031-5. PubMed ID: 104567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observer variation in the interpretation of xeromammograms.
    Boyd NF; Wolfson C; Moskowitz M; Carlile T; Petitclerc M; Ferri HA; Fishell E; Gregoire A; Kiernan M; Longley JD; Simor IS; Miller AB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1982 Mar; 68(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 7038244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of mammographic parenchymal patterns.
    Roebuck EJ
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Jun; 55(654):387-98. PubMed ID: 7104565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiologists' attitudes and use of mammography audit reports.
    Elmore JG; Aiello Bowles EJ; Geller B; Oster NV; Carney PA; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Sickles EA; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Yankaskas BC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):752-60. PubMed ID: 20457418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of mammographic classifications.
    Myers LE; McLelland R; Stricker CX; Feig SA; Martin JE; Moskowitz M; Nielsen ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 6603748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and the prevalence of breast cancer.
    Peyster RG; Kalisher L; Cole P
    Radiology; 1977 Nov; 125(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 910050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists' classification.
    Jong R; Fishell E; Little L; Lockwood G; Boyd NF
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1996 Aug; 5(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 8894565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonic mammographic parenchymal patterns: a preliminary report.
    Rubin CS; Kurtz AB; Goldberg BB; Feig S; Cole-Beuglet C
    Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):515-7. PubMed ID: 760171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between Wolfe's classification of mammograms, accepted breast cancer risk factors, and the incidence of breast cancer.
    Whitehead J; Carlile T; Kopecky KJ; Thompson DJ; Gilbert FI; Present AJ; Threatt BA; Krook P; Hadaway E
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Dec; 122(6):994-1006. PubMed ID: 4061448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk factors for breast cancer.
    Ernster VL; Sacks ST; Peterson CA; Schweitzer RJ
    Radiology; 1980 Mar; 134(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 7355207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.