These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 660097)

  • 1. Geometric and semantic similarity in visual masking.
    Jacobson JZ; Rhinelander G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 May; 4(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 660097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word superiority over isolated letters: the neglected case of forward masking.
    Jordan TR; Bevan KM
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 8035690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word length and visual-noise texture in backward masking.
    Zamansky HS; Corwin TR
    Perception; 1976; 5(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 951170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dichoptic backward masking of letters, words, and trigrams in old and young subjects.
    Cramer G; Kietzman ML; van Laer J
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 7128655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repetition, semantic priming, and stimulus quality: implications for the interactive-compensatory reading model.
    Durgunoglu AY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 2972798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A note on the masking of pictures.
    Forster PM
    Perception; 1982; 11(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 7167340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of graphemic and phonemic similarity between targets and masks in a backward visual masking paradigm.
    Naish P
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1980 Feb; 32(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 7367578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When are morphemic and semantic priming observed in visual word recognition?
    Macnevin C; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Jun; 56(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 12066419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ease of identifying words degraded by visual noise.
    Barber P; de la Mahotière C
    Br J Psychol; 1982 Aug; 73 (Pt 3)():371-81. PubMed ID: 7116083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feature similarity and laterality effects in visual masking.
    Hellige JB
    Neuropsychologia; 1983; 21(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 6664482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Target letter inclusion in single and multiple word substrings and identification accuracy.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1988 Apr; 115(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3385413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of texture on visual noise masking.
    Corwin TR; Zamansky HS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 830184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On visual access to letter case and lexical/semantic information.
    Avant LL; Thieman AA
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Sep; 13(5):392-404. PubMed ID: 4088049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.
    Allport A
    Spat Vis; 2009; 22(6):473-91. PubMed ID: 19891849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating the boundaries of reading units across ages and reading levels.
    Cunningham TF; Healy AF; Kanengiser N; Chizzick L; Willitts RL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1988 Apr; 45(2):175-208. PubMed ID: 3361269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context-dependent similarity effects in letter recognition.
    Kinoshita S; Robidoux S; Guilbert D; Norris D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1458-64. PubMed ID: 25855201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks.
    Jordon TR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):512-30. PubMed ID: 7790831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cerebral asymmetries in early orthographic and phonological reading processes: evidence from backward masking.
    Halderman LK; Chiarello C
    Brain Lang; 2005 Nov; 95(2):342-52. PubMed ID: 16246741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.