These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6601445)

  • 1. A comparison of hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography.
    Sacks BA; Ellison HP; Bartek S; Vine HS; Palestrant AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 May; 140(5):975-7. PubMed ID: 6601445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography.
    Sacks BA; Ellison HP; Bartek S; Vine HS; Palestrant AM
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S320-2. PubMed ID: 6392159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 following left ventriculography and coronary arteriography.
    Svenson RH
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S333-4. PubMed ID: 6392162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A double-blind clinical study comparing tolerability, safety, and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous subtraction angiography.
    Nelson JA; Sherry RA
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S366-7. PubMed ID: 6392166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A double-blind clinical comparison of the electrophysiologic adverse effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76.
    Wolf GL
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S328-32. PubMed ID: 6392161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double-blind comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in computed tomography.
    Berland LL
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S376-7. PubMed ID: 6392168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-60 in knee arthrography.
    Apple JS; Martinez S; Khoury MB; Royster R; Allen S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jul; 145(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 3873834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A double-blind comparative study of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in aortography and visceral arteriography.
    Barth KH; Mertens MA
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S323-5. PubMed ID: 6392160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A double-blind clinical study comparing the safety and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in contrast enhanced computed body tomography.
    McClennan BL; Lee JK; DiSantis DJ; James M
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S378-84. PubMed ID: 6392169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A double-blind randomized clinical study of the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Hexabrix in pediatric angiocardiography.
    Anthony CL; Tonkin IL; Marin-Garcia J; Paul RN; Bell ED; Brooks E; Eastham ED; Fowler SL
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S335-43. PubMed ID: 6392163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A double-blind clinical comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Turski PA; Gentry LR; Matozzi F; Verma S
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S363-5. PubMed ID: 6392165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary evaluation of Hexabrix for temporomandibular joint arthrography.
    Katzberg RW
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S387-8. PubMed ID: 6392170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A double-blind randomized clinical study of the use of Hexabrix in pediatric angiocardiography.
    Tonkin IL
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S344-9. PubMed ID: 6392164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hexabrix as a contrast agent for hysterosalpingography.
    Winfield AC; Maxson WS; Harding DR; Diggs J; Wentz AC
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):232-3. PubMed ID: 6729127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
    Heystraten FM; van den Berg FG; Mulderije ED
    Diagn Imaging; 1983; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pain during angiography: a randomized double-blind trial comparing ioxaglate and diatrizoate.
    Pathria M; Somers S; Gill G
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1987 Mar; 38(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 2953734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: comparison with a conventional contrast agent.
    Spataro RF; Katzberg RW; Fischer HW; McMannis MJ
    Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 3538156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iohexol and iopromide--two new non-ionic water-soluble radiographic contrast media: randomized, intraindividual double-blind study versus ioxaglate in peripheral angiography.
    Hagen B
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():107-14. PubMed ID: 6139064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast media tonicity. Part II. Isotonic ioxaglate vs. standard renografin for IV-DSA evaluation of the carotid bifurcation, a double-blind prospective clinical trial.
    Burbank FH; Bradley BR; Yegnashankaran S; Enzmann DR
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 3516921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporomandibular joint arthrography: comparison of morbidity with ionic and low osmolality contrast media.
    Katzberg RW; Miller TL; Hayakawa K; Manzione JV; Tallents RH
    Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):245-6. PubMed ID: 3883421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.