231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6602825)
21. Correlation between local glaucomatous visual field defects and loss of nerve fiber layer thickness measured with polarimetry and spectral domain OCT.
Horn FK; Mardin CY; Laemmer R; Baleanu D; Juenemann AM; Kruse FE; Tornow RP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 May; 50(5):1971-7. PubMed ID: 19151389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Doyne Memorial Lecture, 1975. Correlation of optic nerve and visual field defects in simple glaucoma.
Drance SM
Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962); 1975 Jul; 95(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 1064227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Tangent screen perimetry using twin test objects.
Coyle JT; Milam DF
Am J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jun; 83(6):923-4. PubMed ID: 868998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visual field defects.
Jay WM
Am Fam Physician; 1981 Aug; 24(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 7258077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [A method of autocampimetric study of the visual field].
Zurgaft MB
Vestn Oftalmol; 1988; 104(5):55-8. PubMed ID: 3222836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Identifying preperimetric functional loss in glaucoma: a blue-on-yellow multifocal visual evoked potentials study.
Arvind H; Graham S; Leaney J; Grigg J; Goldberg I; Billson F; Klistorner A
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1134-41. PubMed ID: 19395037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Coexistence of migraine and glaucoma-like visual field defects].
Nizankowska MH; Turno-Krecicka A; Misiuk-Hojło M; Ejma M; Chełstowska J; Szczesna-Borzemska D; Sasiadek M
Klin Oczna; 1997; 99(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 9379663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Classifying patterns of localized glaucomatous visual field defects on automated perimetry.
Sihota R; Gupta V; Tuli D; Sharma A; Sony P; Srinivasan G
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 17224765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Visual fields interpretation.
Larkin M
J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Sep; 51(9):837-42. PubMed ID: 7451800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Modified technics for the examination of the central visual field].
Richard G
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 2376381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Perception of the blind spot with Rauschfeld campimetry. An additional diagnostic criterion in papillary changes].
Aulhorn E; Schiefer U; Herzau V
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 2272585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative assessment of structural damage in eyes with localized visual field abnormalities.
Bagga H; Greenfield DS
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):797-805. PubMed ID: 15126142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The status of color fields today.
Bailey JE
J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Sep; 51(9):843-7. PubMed ID: 7005298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Poly-static quantitative perimetry for detection of open angle glaucoma].
Lai Z; Lao Y; Ai F
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 36(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 11853601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss.
Bass SJ; Cooper J; Feldman J; Horn D
Optometry; 2007 Aug; 78(8):390-5. PubMed ID: 17662927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
