58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6603132)
1. Use of CT to reduce understaging in prostatic cancer: comparison with conventional staging techniques.
Emory TH; Reinke DB; Hill AL; Lange PH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Aug; 141(2):351-4. PubMed ID: 6603132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between conventional imaging (abdominal-pelvic computed tomography and bone scan) and [(18)F]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for the initial staging of patients with intermediate- tohigh-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective analysis.
Evangelista L; Cimitan M; Zattoni F; Guttilla A; Zattoni F; Saladini G
Scand J Urol; 2015; 49(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 25649494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective evaluation of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the nodal staging of prostate cancer with a high risk of lymph node metastases.
Budiharto T; Joniau S; Lerut E; Van den Bergh L; Mottaghy F; Deroose CM; Oyen R; Ameye F; Bogaerts K; Haustermans K; Van Poppel H
Eur Urol; 2011 Jul; 60(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 21292388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inability of refined CT to assess local extent of prostatic cancer.
Rørvik J; Halvorsen OJ; Espeland A; Haukaas S
Acta Radiol; 1993 Jan; 34(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8427747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The clinical value of preoperative staging of bladder and prostatic cancers with nuclear magnetic resonance and computerized tomography].
Beer M; Schmidt H; Riedl R
Urologe A; 1989 Mar; 28(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 2718295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging of the prostatic cancer.
Javadpour N; Campbell EW; Young JD
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 243B():77-87. PubMed ID: 3659053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Computer tomographic staging of prostatic carcinomas (author's transl)].
Lütgemeier J; Wunschik F; Hörst M
Rofo; 1981 May; 134(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 6167501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staging of localized prostate cancer: a clinical-pathologic correlation.
Mukamel E; de Kernion JB; Hannah J; Barbaric Z
J Urol (Paris); 1988; 94(8):381-8. PubMed ID: 3241091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Place of the computed tomography in the staging of prostatic cancer.
Mazeman E; Lemaître L; Rigot JM; Lambert I
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 243B():55-64. PubMed ID: 3659051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography in preoperative lymph node staging of non-small cell lung cancer.
Xu N; Wang M; Zhu Z; Zhang Y; Jiao Y; Fang W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 24534208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Computed tomographic staging of prostatic cancer].
Triller J; Fuchs WA
Rofo; 1982 Dec; 137(6):669-74. PubMed ID: 6218044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detecting lymphatic metastases from prostatic carcinoma: superiority of CT.
Levine MS; Arger PH; Coleman BG; Mulhern CB; Pollack HM; Wein AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Aug; 137(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 6789623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of CT and CT-guided nodal biopsy in staging of prostatic cancer.
Amis ES
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):309-10. PubMed ID: 8284373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pelvic adenopathy from bladder and prostate carcinoma: detection by rapid-sequence computed tomography.
Weinerman PM; Arger PH; Coleman BG; Pollack HM; Banner MP; Wein AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jan; 140(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 6600330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [MR tomography in prostatic carcinoma: comparison of conventional and endorectal MRT].
Nicolas V; Beese M; Keulers A; Bressel M; Kastendieck H; Huland H
Rofo; 1994 Oct; 161(4):319-26. PubMed ID: 7948978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative intrathoracic lymph node staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography.
Billé A; Pelosi E; Skanjeti A; Arena V; Errico L; Borasio P; Mancini M; Ardissone F
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Sep; 36(3):440-5. PubMed ID: 19464906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scanning with 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detection of pelvic nodal involvement in inguinal node-positive penile carcinoma.
Graafland NM; Leijte JA; Valdés Olmos RA; Hoefnagel CA; Teertstra HJ; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2009 Aug; 56(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 19477581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymph node staging by CT scan before radical prostatectomy.
Ameye F; Van Poppel H; Oyen R; Vande Voorde W; Baert L
Acta Urol Belg; 1994 Jun; 62(2):57. PubMed ID: 8037006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques.
Koolen BB; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Aukema TS; Vogel WV; Oldenburg HS; van der Hage JA; Hoefnagel CA; Stokkel MP; Loo CE; Rodenhuis S; Rutgers EJ; Valdés Olmos RA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jan; 131(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 21935602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of PET/CT versus enhanced CT for locoregional lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer.
Yang W; Fu Z; Yu J; Yuan S; Zhang B; Li D; Xing L; Zhao D; Mu D; Sun X; Fang Y; Huang Y; Li W
Lung Cancer; 2008 Jul; 61(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18177978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
