These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6605401)

  • 1. Pennhurst, Romeo, and Rogers. The Burger Court and Mental Health Law Reform Litigation.
    Brant J
    J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):323-48. PubMed ID: 6605401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Granting rights to the retarded.
    Will GF
    Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11647763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo: before the court at the mercy of institutional professionals.
    Meyer SM; Soskin RM
    J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 11658596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
    Ferleger D; Scott PM
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mental health law--42 U.S.C. Section 6010 held not to create substantive rights in favor of mentally retarded: Pennhurst State School v. Halderman, 101 S.Ct. 1531 (1981).
    Calvey FL
    Marquette Law Rev; 1981; 65(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 11658449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1984 Jan; 465():89-167. PubMed ID: 12041274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Youngberg v. Romeo.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1982 Jun; 457():307-31. PubMed ID: 12041273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
    Herbert W
    Sci News; 1982 Jun; 121(26):420. PubMed ID: 11658305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded.
    Gallo LV
    Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
    Smith GG
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Supreme Court and institutions: a comment on Youngberg v. Romeo.
    Ellis JW
    Ment Retard; 1982 Oct; 20(5):197-200. PubMed ID: 7176913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
    Appelbaum PS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1981 Apr; 451():1-55. PubMed ID: 12041272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Court considers case on mentally retarded.
    Nations Health; 1981 Feb; 11(2):1, 8. PubMed ID: 11658338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Romeo v. Youngberg.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1980 Nov; 644():147-86. PubMed ID: 11648465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
    Wallach S
    Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
    Belzer I
    UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.