These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6605402)
1. The informed intermediary doctrine and the pharmacist's duty to warn. Brushwood DB J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):349-82. PubMed ID: 6605402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Computers, OBRA 90 and the pharmacist's duty to warn. Cacciatore GG Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1997 Jul; (221):9-25. PubMed ID: 10168619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Pharmaceutical Access and Prudent Purchasing Act of 1990: Federal law shifts the duty to warn from the physician to the pharmacist. Holleran MJ Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1993 Dec; (178):9-30. PubMed ID: 10131324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A defense of the learned intermediary doctrine. Goetz RB; Growdon KR Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(2):421-38. PubMed ID: 18561470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Burden of proof: judging science and protecting public health in (and out of) the courtroom. Annas GJ Am J Public Health; 1999 Apr; 89(4):490-3. PubMed ID: 10191788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The pharmacist's duty under OBRA-90 standards. Brushwood DB J Leg Med; 1997 Dec; 18(4):475-509. PubMed ID: 9433037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Taking Tarasoff where no one has gone before: looking at "duty to warn" under the AIDS crisis. Stenger CE St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1996; 15(2):471-504. PubMed ID: 11656884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of seropositive AIDS inmates in the prison population: the Michigan approach. Donaldson PG Wayne Law Rev; 1990; 36(4):1589-618. PubMed ID: 11651344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Drug information for patients. Duties of the manufacturer, pharmacist, physician, and hospital. Brushwood DB; Simonsmeier LM J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):279-340. PubMed ID: 3490527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent. Grubbs WG Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient participation in medical decision-making: are the courts the answer? Bromberger B Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11649729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The scarlet letter "A": AIDS in a computer society. van Dam MN Comput Law J; 1990 Apr; 10(2):233-64. PubMed ID: 11653972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The psychiatric duty to warn: walking a tightrope of uncertainty. McClarren GM Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1987; 56(1):269-93. PubMed ID: 11658955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Placebos: a misbranding dilemma. Stachowski D Health (N Y); 1993; 40(1):102-18. PubMed ID: 11652319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulation of electroconvulsive therapy. Mich Law Rev; 1976 Dec; 75(2):363-412. PubMed ID: 10236528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaccines and the law. Sanzo M Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 19(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11659523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulating genetic engineering in an era of increased judicial deference: a proper balance of the federal powers. Von Oehsen WH Adm Law Rev; 1988; 40(3):303-44. PubMed ID: 11650827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed dissent: a new corollary to the informed consent doctrine? Friedman DA Chic Kent Law Rev; 1981; 57(4):1119-44. PubMed ID: 11658347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]