These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6606317)

  • 1. Multiple NMR T2 relaxation values in human liver tissue.
    Bernardino ME; Small W; Goldstein J; Sewell CW; Sones PJ; Gedgaudas-McClees K; Galambos JT; Wenger J; Casarella WJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Dec; 141(6):1203-8. PubMed ID: 6606317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NMR imaging of the abdomen: technical considerations.
    Buonocore E; Borkowski GP; Pavlicek W; Ngo F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Dec; 141(6):1171-8. PubMed ID: 6606313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Differential diagnosis of liver diseases in the nuclear spin tomogram].
    Rödl W
    Rofo; 1985 May; 142(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 2988031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of primary liver cancer--MRI-pathologic correlation.
    Ohtomo K; Itai Y; Furui S; Yoshikawa K; Yashiro N; Iio M
    Radiat Med; 1985; 3(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 2999880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Focal liver lesions: characterization with quantitative analysis of T2 relaxation time in TSE sequence with double echo time.
    Cittadini G; Santacroce E; Giasotto V; Rescinito G
    Radiol Med; 2004 Mar; 107(3):166-73. PubMed ID: 15031682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging of cavernous hemangioma of the liver: tissue-specific characterization.
    Stark DD; Felder RC; Wittenberg J; Saini S; Butch RJ; White ME; Edelman RR; Mueller PR; Simeone JF; Cohen AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Aug; 145(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 2992250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calculation of T2 relaxation time from ultrafast single shot sequences for differentiation of liver tumors: comparison of echo-planar, HASTE, and spin-echo sequences.
    Abe Y; Yamashita Y; Tang Y; Namimoto T; Takahashi M
    Radiat Med; 2000; 18(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 10852650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: pathologic correlation with high-field MR imaging.
    Tung GA; Vaccaro JP; Cronan JJ; Rogg JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1113-7. PubMed ID: 8165993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metabolic profile of chronic liver disease by NMR spectroscopy of human biopsies.
    Martínez-Granados B; Morales JM; Rodrigo JM; Del Olmo J; Serra MA; Ferrández A; Celda B; Monleón D
    Int J Mol Med; 2011 Jan; 27(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 21072494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the liver: correlation with standardized serum, clinical, and histological changes in diffuse liver disease.
    van Wassenaer-van Hall HN; van der Grond J; van Hattum J; Kooijman C; Hoogenraad TU; Mali WP
    Hepatology; 1995 Feb; 21(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 7843719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in the study of the liver and its diseases].
    Rödl W
    Z Gastroenterol; 1985 Jan; 23(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 2998107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hepatic fat quantification: a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and analysis methods for chemical-shift gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging with histologic assessment as the reference standard.
    Kang BK; Yu ES; Lee SS; Lee Y; Kim N; Sirlin CB; Cho EY; Yeom SK; Byun JH; Park SH; Lee MG
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Jun; 47(6):368-75. PubMed ID: 22543969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value of T1 and T2 relaxation times from echoplanar MR imaging in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions.
    Goldberg MA; Hahn PF; Saini S; Cohen MS; Reimer P; Brady TJ; Mueller PR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):1011-7. PubMed ID: 8470568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Tissue characterization with T1, T2 and proton density: dream and reality].
    Higer HP; Bielke G
    Rofo; 1986 May; 144(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 3012688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.
    Larson RE; Semelka RC
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 7(2):71-81. PubMed ID: 7772372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Nuclear spin tomographic studies in liver diseases].
    Baumann R; Grodd W; Kurtz B
    Rofo; 1985 May; 142(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 2988030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postnatal changes in water content and proton magnetic resonance relaxation times in newborn rabbit tissues.
    Berényi E; Szendrö Z; Rózsahegyl P; Bogner P; Sulyok E
    Pediatr Res; 1996 Jun; 39(6):1091-8. PubMed ID: 8725275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Detection of cancer by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging].
    Sakuma S
    Gan No Rinsho; 1983 Aug; 29(10):1186-90. PubMed ID: 6313982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging in the evaluation of the liver: a preliminary experience.
    Borkowski GP; Buonocore E; George CR; Go RT; O'Donovan PB; Meaney TF
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1983 Oct; 7(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 6886126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sampling variability on percutaneous liver biopsy.
    Abdi W; Millan JC; Mezey E
    Arch Intern Med; 1979 Jun; 139(6):667-9. PubMed ID: 443970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.