These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. The use of intra-arterial lidocaine to control pain due to aortofemoral arteriography. Widrich WC; Singer RJ; Robbins AH Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 325598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Evaluation of the permeability of aortocoronary bypass by digital angiography]. Vandenbosch G; Delcour C; Delatte P; Struyven J J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 69(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 3283338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Coronary artery bypass graft patency: assessment with true ast imaging with steady-state precession versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Bunce NH; Lorenz CH; John AS; Lesser JR; Mohiaddin RH; Pennell DJ Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):440-6. PubMed ID: 12676968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Intravenous digital angiography]. Mestres JM; Mundi N; Sala Planell E Med Clin (Barc); 1985 Sep; 85(7):282-9. PubMed ID: 4058085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Contrast media enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for determining patency of a coronary bypass. A comparison with coronary angiography]. Wintersperger BJ; von Smekal A; Engelmann MG; Knez A; Penzkofer HV; Laub G; Reiser M Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 9465951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Ko YG; Choi DH; Jang YS; Chung NS; Shim WH; Cho SY; Yoo KJ; Chang BC; Choi BW Yonsei Med J; 2003 Jun; 44(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 12833581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Digital subtraction angiography of aortocoronary bypass grafts in the early postoperative phase with peripheral vein x-ray contrast media injection]. Tuengerthal S; Donhöffner A; Lang J Digitale Bilddiagn; 1985 Jun; 5(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 3893854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [X-ray contrast embolization material based on Sephadex and urogranic acid. Experimental studies]. Szmigielski W; Mucha M; Rubaj B Pol Przegl Radiol; 1983; 47(5-6):387-90. PubMed ID: 6205385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Contrast dose and signal/noise ratio in digital angiography]. Nicolais S; Grilli G; Pirronti T; Falappa P Radiol Med; 1985 Sep; 71(9):565-8. PubMed ID: 4089253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Other applications of numeric angiography]. Gaux JC; Seurot M J Mal Vasc; 1984; 9(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 6231348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The use of contrast media in digital subtraction angiography. Roux E; Niendorf HP J Belge Radiol; 1983; 66(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 6662850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]