These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6608680)

  • 1. Rabbinic comment: The rights of adolescents.
    Feldman DM
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 6608680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The rights of adolescents in a medical setting.
    Young JG
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 6608679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Youth, health care decisions, and confidentiality -- a survey report.
    Norris S
    Bioethics Forum; 1998; 14(3-4):28-31. PubMed ID: 11660724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parental notification: a state-created obstacle to a minor woman's right of privacy.
    Bush SA
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):579-603. PubMed ID: 11655618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes.
    Byrne TJ
    Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
    Paul EW; Klassel D
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond.
    Best M
    Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical considerations concerning adolescents consulting for contraceptive services.
    Silber TJ
    J Fam Pract; 1982 Nov; 15(5):909-11. PubMed ID: 7130918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW
    West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD
    St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parental notification and public policy.
    Diamond EF
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 11656615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Easing restrictions on minors' abortion rights.
    O'Keeffe J; Jones JM
    Issues Sci Technol; 1990; 7(4):74-80. PubMed ID: 11659333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parental notification.
    Utah
    Utah Code Annot 1953 Utah; 1983; Sections 76.7.321 and 76.7.325():. PubMed ID: 12043638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constitutional law--a minor's abortion right under a parental notice statute.
    Czarnecki MS
    Wayne Law Rev; 1982; 28(4):1901-28. PubMed ID: 11658440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. H.L. v. Matheson: parental notice prior to abortion.
    Medler MA
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1982 Jan; 26(2):426-46. PubMed ID: 11655739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A minor's right to abortion -- the unconstitutionality of parental participation in bypass hearings.
    Ehrlich JS; Sabino JA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1991; 25(4):1185-209. PubMed ID: 11659404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parent versus child: H.L. v. Matheson and the new abortion litigation.
    Bridge B
    Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(1):75-116. PubMed ID: 11655605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.