These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6610101)
1. [Late results of coronary heart surgery. Late graft patency in coronary bypass procedure]. Kito Y; Fujita T; Ohara T; Kosakai Y; Kawazoe K; Hayashi K; Ego Y; Fujii H; Kozuka T; Naito H Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Sep; 84(9):851-4. PubMed ID: 6610101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts: robustness in emergency and clinical routine settings. Heye T; Kauczor HU; Szabo G; Hosch W Acta Radiol; 2014 Mar; 55(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 23908242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Three-dimensional reconstruction of electron beam computed tomography angiography for evaluating coronary artery bypass graft patency]. Dai R; Lu B; Zhang S Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1998 Jun; 78(6):444-7. PubMed ID: 10923508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Usefulness of coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography in the evaluation of aorto-coronary bypass patency]. Novo G; Runza G; Evola S; Triolo OF; Alaimo V; Rizzo M; La Fata A; Palazzolo G; Sutera F; Andolina G; Hoffmann E; Novo S; Midiri M G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2007 Dec; 8(12):770-6. PubMed ID: 18085102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical value of coronary bypass graft evaluation with CT. Godwin JD; Califf RM; Korobkin M; Moore AV; Breiman RS; Kong Y AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Apr; 140(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 6601365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as an outpatient screening method for the follow-up of graft patency in coronary surgery. Boonstra PW; Boeve WJ; Mooyaart E; Eijgelaar A J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1989; 30(5):764-7. PubMed ID: 2808495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Visualization of aorto-coronary bypass grafts with the aid of non-dynamic computer tomography]. Daniel W; Döhring W; Elgeti H; Lichtlen PR; Stender HS; Borst HG Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1980 Nov; 110(45):1654-7. PubMed ID: 6974394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of aortocoronary bypass graft patency by intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography compared to selective graft angiography. Grigg LE; Hunt D; Chan W; Thomson K Aust N Z J Med; 1988 Aug; 18(5):651-5. PubMed ID: 3072949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-selective intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts. Steffenino G; Meier B; Bopp P; Finci L; von Segesser L; Doriot PA; Adatte JJ; Killisch JP; Casalini P; Rutishauser W Int J Card Imaging; 1985; 1(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 3916436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts by X-ray computed tomography with and without contrast enhancement]. Tamiya E; Ito N; Kinugawa K; Hada Y J Cardiol; 1992; 22(4):625-33. PubMed ID: 1343628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Ko YG; Choi DH; Jang YS; Chung NS; Shim WH; Cho SY; Yoo KJ; Chang BC; Choi BW Yonsei Med J; 2003 Jun; 44(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 12833581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft status by computed tomography. Kahl FR; Wolfman NT; Watts LE Am J Cardiol; 1981 Aug; 48(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 6973923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency with tomodensitometry and exercise myocardial scintigraphy]. Usdin JP; Vasile N; Cinotti L; Meignan M; Legendre T; Larde P; Szwarc G; Vernant P Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1983 Feb; 76(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 6407426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Long-term evaluation of aorto-coronary bypass surgery]. Yacoub M; De Gasperis C G Ital Cardiol; 1982; 12(11):775-9. PubMed ID: 6985036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Graft patency and myocardial viability after aorto-coronary bypass surgery evaluated by exercise 201T1 myocardial SPECT]. Yada T; Futagami Y; Koyama T; Iwata J; Konishi T; Hamada M; Nakano T; Takezawa H; Yuasa H; Kusagawa M J Cardiol; 1988 Jun; 18(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 3266878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative assessment of ct-bypass angiography and invasive coronary angiography in patients after coronary bypass surgery in the late postoperative period]. Men'kov IA; Trufanov GE; Zhelezniak IS; Rud' SD; Kniazev EA Voen Med Zh; 2013 Oct; 334(10):45-9. PubMed ID: 24611296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography. Willmann JK; Mayer D; Banyai M; Desbiolles LM; Verdun FR; Seifert B; Marincek B; Weishaupt D Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 14595148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of coronary artery graft patency by computed tomography. Comparison with coronary arteriography (author's transl)]. Mühlberger V; zur Nedden D; Knapp E; Unger F; Scharfetter H; Braunsteiner H Z Kardiol; 1981 May; 70(5):377-9. PubMed ID: 6973900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The value of CT and MRT in assessing aortocoronary venous bypasses in comparison with coronary angiography]. Wicke K; Mühlberger V; Judmaier W; Moes N; zur Nedden D Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 1849300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]