These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Serial angiographic evaluation 1 year and 9 years after aorta-coronary bypass. A study of 55 patients chosen at random. Frey RR; Bruschke AV; Vermeulen FE J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Feb; 87(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 6607386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Comparison between angiographic and computed tomographic imaging of aortocoronary bypasses in 100 patients]. Mühlberger V; Knapp E; zur Nedden D; Braunsteiner H Rofo; 1985 Apr; 142(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 2986217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The use of computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery bypass graft patency. Guthaner DF; Brody WR; Ricci M; Oyer PE; Wexler L Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1980; 3(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 6966186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Coronary arteries and coronary artery bypass in CT: options, limitations and perspectives]. Steiner P Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Sep; 5(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 7495888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency by X-ray computed tomography]. Sakuma I; Kimura T; Kawasaki H; Oyama Y; Kazui T; Komatsu S Kokyu To Junkan; 1983 Aug; 31(8):897-904. PubMed ID: 6606841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Peripheral venous digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of aortocoronary venous bypass grafts]. Luska G; Hendrickx P; Kuhl A; Lichtlen P Rofo; 1985 Jan; 142(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 2982188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Improvement of specificity in evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts by serial (dynamic) computed tomography (author's transl)]. Mühlberger V; zur Nedden D; Unger F; Scharfetter H Z Kardiol; 1982 Apr; 71(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 6979836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]