These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6611076)

  • 1. Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population.
    Schmitt EL; Threatt B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 6611076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective breast cancer detection with film-screen mammography.
    Schmitt EL; Threatt BA
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1985 Dec; 36(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 4086500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tumor location and detectability in mammographic screening.
    Schmitt EL; Threatt B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Oct; 139(4):761-5. PubMed ID: 6981939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Twenty-year follow-up of the breast cancers diagnosed during the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.
    Smart CR; Byrne C; Smith RA; Garfinkel L; Letton AH; Dodd GD; Beahrs OH
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1997; 47(3):134-49. PubMed ID: 9152171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Twenty-year follow-up of minimal breast cancer from the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.
    Lopez MJ; Smart CR
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1997 Apr; 6(2):393-401. PubMed ID: 9115504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tumor size distribution of invasive breast cancers and the sensitivity of screening methods in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
    Shaevitch D; Taghipour S; Miller AB; Montgomery N; Harvey B
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(3):562-569. PubMed ID: 28862227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Mammography].
    Grégoire A; Bernard C; Lavallée G; Morin C; Philie M
    Union Med Can; 1992; 121(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 1413293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calcifications in digital mammographic screening: improvement of early detection of invasive breast cancers?
    Weigel S; Decker T; Korsching E; Hungermann D; Böcker W; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):738-45. PubMed ID: 20501713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening.
    Hackshaw AK; Wald NJ; Michell MJ; Field S; Wilson AR
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 10873691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Dec; 147(6):1149-53. PubMed ID: 3490749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Algorithm for the detection of fine clustered calcifications on film mammograms.
    Fam BW; Olson SL; Winter PF; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 3174981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of combined film-screen/xeromammography: preliminary report.
    Pagani JJ; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Benedetti J; Arndt RD; Linsman J; Scanlan RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Jul; 135(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 6771979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on the detection of invasive cancers: results from the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
    Young KC; Wallis MG; Blanks RG; Moss SM
    Br J Radiol; 1997 May; 70(833):482-8. PubMed ID: 9227229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo demonstration of microcalcification in breast cancer using high resolution ultrasound.
    Yang WT; Suen M; Ahuja A; Metreweli C
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):685-90. PubMed ID: 9245879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The technique and results of mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disappearing breast calcifications.
    Parker MD; Clark RL; McLelland R; Daughtery K
    Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3):677-80. PubMed ID: 2772174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening.
    Ma I; Dueck A; Gray R; Wasif N; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Pizzitola V; Pockaj B
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 22160521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of two view mammography compared with one view in the detection of small invasive cancers: further results from the National Health Service breast screening programme.
    Blanks RG; Moss SM; Wallis MG
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 9275268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.
    Seidman H; Gelb SK; Silverberg E; LaVerda N; Lubera JA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1987; 37(5):258-90. PubMed ID: 3115506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic factors of breast neoplasms detected on screening by mammography and physical examination.
    Feig SA; Schwartz GF; Nerlinger R; Edeiken J
    Radiology; 1979 Dec; 133(3 Pt 1):577-82. PubMed ID: 504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.