These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6611827)

  • 1. The frequency of complications in cesarean and noncesarean deliveries, 1970 and 1978.
    Placek PJ; Taffel SM
    Public Health Rep; 1983; 98(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 6611827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obstetric outcomes in 102 pregnancies after preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
    Strom CM; Strom S; Levine E; Ginsberg N; Barton J; Verlinsky Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1629-32. PubMed ID: 10871489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complications in cesarean and non-cesarean deliveries: United States, 1980.
    Taffel SM; Placek PJ
    Am J Public Health; 1983 Aug; 73(8):856-60. PubMed ID: 6869637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controversies: selective vaginal delivery for breech presentation.
    Erkkola R
    J Perinat Med; 1996; 24(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 9120738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-hospital maternal mortality in the United States: time trends and relation to method of delivery.
    Petitti DB; Cefalo RC; Shapiro S; Whalley P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jan; 59(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 7078850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
    Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
    Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery.
    Doyle NM; Riggs JW; Ramin SM; Sosa MA; Gilstrap LC
    Am J Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 22(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 16118722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Surgical delivery in Norway during the last 20 years--analysis of great changes].
    Bergsjø P; Borthen I; Daltveit AK
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Apr; 113(10):1206-11. PubMed ID: 8493647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in cesarean section rates for the United States, 1970--78.
    Placek PJ; Taffel SM
    Public Health Rep; 1980; 95(6):540-8. PubMed ID: 7433601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal delivery in patients with a prior cesarean section.
    Lavin JP; Stephens RJ; Miodovnik M; Barden TP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Feb; 59(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 7078857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990.
    Taffel SM
    Vital Health Stat 21 Data Natal Marriage Divorce; 1994 May; (51):1-24. PubMed ID: 8049307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.
    Landon MB; Spong CY; Thom E; Hauth JC; Bloom SL; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 16816050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trial of scar.
    Davies JA; Spencer JA
    Br J Hosp Med; 1988 Nov; 40(5):379-81. PubMed ID: 3069172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing complications in intended vaginal and caesarean deliveries.
    Kor-Anantakul O; Suwanrath C; Lim A; Chongsuviwatwong V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jan; 28(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18259902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.