These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6611827)
21. Recent patterns in cesarean delivery in the United States. Placek PJ; Taffel SM Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1988 Dec; 15(4):607-27. PubMed ID: 3226670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Kennare R; Tucker G; Heard A; Chan A Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):270-6. PubMed ID: 17267823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG; Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Peripartum hysterectomy and associated factors. Bai SW; Lee HJ; Cho JS; Park YW; Kim SK; Park KH J Reprod Med; 2003 Mar; 48(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 12698770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Average charges for uncomplicated cesarean and vaginal deliveries, United States, 1993. Mushinski M Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1994; 75(4):27-36. PubMed ID: 7817268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Change in cesarean section rate as a reflection of the present malpractice crisis. Ryan K; Schnatz P; Greene J; Curry S Conn Med; 2005 Mar; 69(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 15861999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002. Linton A; Peterson MR Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Increased risk of stroke in patients who undergo cesarean section delivery: a nationwide population-based study. Lin SY; Hu CJ; Lin HC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 198(4):391.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18279835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assisted breech delivery, is the art fading? Akinola SE; Archibong EI; Bhawani KP; Sobande AA Saudi Med J; 2002 Apr; 23(4):423-6. PubMed ID: 11953768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Management of labor after previous cesarean section]. Scholtes G; Milz H Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1982; 186(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 6891861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care. Maassen MS; Hendrix MJ; Van Vugt HC; Veersema S; Smits F; Nijhuis JG Birth; 2008 Dec; 35(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 19036039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Active-phase arrest in labor: predictors of cesarean delivery in a nulliparous population. Handa VL; Laros RK Obstet Gynecol; 1993 May; 81(5 ( Pt 1)):758-63. PubMed ID: 8469468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Identifying risk factors for peripartum cesarean hysterectomy. A population-based study. Sheiner E; Levy A; Katz M; Mazor M J Reprod Med; 2003 Aug; 48(8):622-6. PubMed ID: 12971143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The counselling of patient with prior C-section]. Rozenberg P Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1003-8. PubMed ID: 16321558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcome of a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Eglinton GS; Phelan JP; Yeh S; Diaz FP; Wallace TM; Paul RH J Reprod Med; 1984 Jan; 29(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 6708017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Delayed parenthood and the risk of cesarean delivery--is paternal age an independent risk factor? Tang CH; Wu MP; Liu JT; Lin HC; Hsu CC Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16499528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]