These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6611910)

  • 61. A method to absorb scattered radiation without attenuation of the primary beam.
    Moore R; Korbuly D; Amplatz K
    Radiology; 1976 Sep; 120(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 948608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Radiation dose reduction on a portable image intensifier digital storage unit.
    Fleay RF
    Australas Radiol; 1987 Feb; 31(1):88-9. PubMed ID: 3619815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Energy and angular dependence of x-ray absorption and its effect on radiographic response in screen--film systems.
    Chan HP; Doi K
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 May; 28(5):565-79. PubMed ID: 6867113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Nuclear physics, radiation protection, roentgen technology. Roentgen exposure systems (review report)].
    Friedrich C
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1978 Apr; 19(2):269-81. PubMed ID: 674617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Effect of dimension of space between the amplifying screens and the film on the quality of x-ray image].
    Chikirdin EG; Moskalets IuV; Novikov VIa
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1976; (3):60-4. PubMed ID: 982797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Energy imparted to fluorescent screens from primary and scattered radiation. Variations with atomic composition and screen thickness.
    Nielsen B; Carlsson CA
    Phys Med Biol; 1984 Apr; 29(4):315-28. PubMed ID: 6718486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Screen film processing systems for medical radiography: a historical review.
    Haus AG; Cullinan JE
    Radiographics; 1989 Nov; 9(6):1203-24. PubMed ID: 2685941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [X-ray film evaluation with a new equidensitometric film (author's transl)].
    Müllenberg W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1974 Oct; 121(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 4373351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Scatter fraction and image contrast.
    Venema HW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):835-6. PubMed ID: 10063895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [Compensatory foils in teleradiography of the skull].
    von Ritter W; Mlosek K
    Pol Przegl Radiol; 1986; 50(4):222-4. PubMed ID: 3295806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Conventional Film-Screen Principles of Exposure Selection in the Digital Age.
    Steward A; Tarollo M; Mandarano G; Lombardi C
    Radiol Technol; 2018 May; 89(5):488-494. PubMed ID: 29793908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Impact of new digital X- and gamma ray imaging systems upon patient doses.
    Speller R; Royle G; Scannavini MG; Horrocks J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 10028634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A lung opacity caused by grid artifact.
    Heriard JB; Varma DG
    Radiol Technol; 1986; 58(2):147-8. PubMed ID: 3786696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Wiener spectral effects of spatial correlation between the sites of characteristic x-ray emission and reabsorption in radiographic screen-film systems.
    Metz CE; Vyborny CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 May; 28(5):547-64. PubMed ID: 6867112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Less radiation, better images.
    Vijlbrief P
    Radiol Clin (Basel); 1976; 45(2-4):326-35. PubMed ID: 948580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [What effect do intensifying screens and general lack of resolution have on tomography?].
    Meiler J
    Rontgenblatter; 1973 Jan; 26(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 4791869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Energy absorbed in calcium tungstate x-ray screens.
    Shuping RE; Judy PF
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 882059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Comparative measurements of radiation dose between large and medium format technics in roentgen diagnosis of female urinary incontinence].
    Müller B; Abét L; Richter J
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1987; 28(3):427-35. PubMed ID: 3659337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Image quality standards.
    Barnhard HJ
    Radiology; 1982 Apr; 143(1):275-6. PubMed ID: 7063743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Characterization of the veiling glare PSF in x-ray image intensified fluoroscopy.
    Seibert JA; Nalcioglu O; Roeck WW
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 6727792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.