These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6612218)

  • 1. Cochlear initiation sites of the frequency following potential.
    McDermott JC
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 6612218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear distribution of frequency-following response initiation. A high-pass masking noise study.
    Yamada O; Kodera K; Hink RF; Suzuki JI
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 496720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-pass and notch noise masking in suprathreshold brainstem response audiometry.
    Laukli E
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 6612212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Derived brain stem responses by means of pure-tone masking.
    Pantev C; Pantev M
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 7178798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 500 Hz frequency-following potential in kangaroo rat: an evaluation with noise masking.
    Bledsoe SC; Moushegian G
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Jun; 48(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 6155254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of the intensity of masking noise on ear canal recorded low-frequency cochlear microphonic waveforms in normal hearing subjects.
    Zhang M
    Hear Res; 2014 Jul; 313():9-17. PubMed ID: 24793117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1214-23. PubMed ID: 6643844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A timesaving BERA technique for frequency-specific assessment of the auditory threshold through tone-pulse series stimulation (TOPSTIM) with simultaneous gliding high-pass noise masking (GHINOMA).
    Hoke M; Pantev C; Ansa L; Lütkenhöner B; Herrmann E
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 482():45-56; discussion 57. PubMed ID: 1897361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Derived acoustically evoked brainstem responses by means of narrow-band and notched-noise masking in normal-hearing subjects.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 6463552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Kadhim H; Deltenre P
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The amplitude modulation-following response as an audiometric tool.
    Griffiths SK; Chambers RD
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 1783225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to bone-conducted stimuli.
    Kramer SJ
    Audiology; 1992; 31(2):61-71. PubMed ID: 1610314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.
    Purdy SC; Houghton JM; Keith WJ; Greville KA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2930366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey of attempts to use auditory evoked potentials to obtain an audiogram. Review article.
    Sohmer H; Kinarti R
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Nov; 18(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 6395931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musical experience sharpens human cochlear tuning.
    Bidelman GM; Nelms C; Bhagat SP
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():40-46. PubMed ID: 26900073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.