These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6612218)

  • 21. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise.
    van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 6732630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masked tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig.
    Canlon B; Marklund K; Borg E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3232-43. PubMed ID: 8300958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low-frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem response threshold elicited by clicks masked with 1590-Hz high-pass noise in subjects with sloping cochlear hearing losses.
    Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):272-83. PubMed ID: 1449430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cochlear initiation site of the frequency-following response: a study of patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Yamada O; Kodera K; Hink RF; Yamane H
    Audiology; 1978; 17(6):489-99. PubMed ID: 718538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The frequency specificity of tone-pip evoked auditory brain stem responses.
    Kileny P
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 7308602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of the cochlear microphonic to a low-frequency tone embedded in filtered noise.
    Chertoff ME; Earl BR; Diaz FJ; Sorensen JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3351-62. PubMed ID: 23145616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of cochlear amplification, frequency tuning, and two-tone suppression in the mouse.
    Song L; McGee J; Walsh EJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):344-55. PubMed ID: 17989242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Evaluation of compound action potential tuning curves from normal guinea pig cochleas].
    Han D
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1992; 27(1):17-20, 60-1. PubMed ID: 1591036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs.
    Boothalingam S; Lineton B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 22934932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Psychophysical tuning functions for brief stimuli: preliminary report.
    Durrant JD; Gabriel S; Walter M
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1981 May; 2(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 7270800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The 40-Hz potential and SN10 as measures of low-frequency thresholds.
    Fowler CG; Swanson MR
    Scand Audiol; 1989; 18(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 2749172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds.
    Long GR
    Hear Res; 1984 Jul; 15(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 6480525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A new parameter in brain stem evoked response: component wave areas.
    Anthony PF; Durrett R; Pulec JL; Hartstone JL
    Laryngoscope; 1979 Oct; 89(10 Pt 1):1569-78. PubMed ID: 388123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cochlear threshold assessment using tone-derived action potentials.
    Salt AN; Vora AR
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 2383213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Frequency discrimination at 1200 Hz in the presence of high-frequency masking noise.
    Nelson DA; Stanton ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):660-4. PubMed ID: 7085971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Frequency-following potentials in man by lock-in technique.
    Euler M; Kiessling J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Nov; 52(5):400-4. PubMed ID: 6171404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Noise masking of tone responses and critical ratios in single units of the mouse cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus.
    Ehret G; Moffat AJ
    Hear Res; 1984 Apr; 14(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 6746421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pure-tone masking profiles for human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses.
    Mackersie C; Down KE; Stapells DR
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 8458760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.