These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6612339)
1. HHS preparing to issue new Baby Doe rules. Holden C Science; 1983 Sep; 221(4617):1269-70. PubMed ID: 6612339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe. Paige C; Karnofsky EB J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Baby Doe regulations: governmental intervention in neonatal rescue medicine. Annas GJ Am J Public Health; 1984 Jun; 74(6):618-20. PubMed ID: 6232863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Baby Doe regulations: another view of change. Weil WB Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 3700073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants. Brown LD J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):231-54. PubMed ID: 3745838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment. Britton JR West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal court strikes down Baby Doe rules. Holden C Science; 1984 Jun; 224(4653):1078-9. PubMed ID: 6719132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One man's burden. O'Donnell M Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 May; 286(6376):1521. PubMed ID: 11652402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The future of Baby Doe. Singer P; Kuhse H New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. American Academy of Pediatrics v. Heckler. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Fed Suppl; 1983 Apr; 561():395-404. PubMed ID: 11648234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations. Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Koop acted as midwife for new 'Baby Doe' rule. Barringer F Washington Post; 1984 Jan; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants. Newman SA Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 2764010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical groups' suit seeks to put legal padlock on 'Baby Doe' reg. Gibbons DL Med World News; 1984 Apr; 25(7):19, 23. PubMed ID: 10267469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The 'Baby Doe' rule. Stevenson DK; Ariagno RL; Kutner JS; Raffin TA; Young EW JAMA; 1986 Apr; 255(14):1909-12. PubMed ID: 3951118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. United States: treatment of severely handicapped infants. Lancet; 1983 Oct; 2(8356):960-1. PubMed ID: 11644271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Severely handicapped infants with life-threatening conditions: federal intrusions into the decision not to treat. Huefner DS Am J Law Med; 1986; 12(2):171-205. PubMed ID: 2964778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ; Balch BJ Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]