These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6613344)

  • 1. [Electrophysiologic study of the reactions of the brain to regular and skipped acoustic stimuli in man].
    Opolinskiĭ ES; Konovalov VF; Rozhkova LA; Batyr' OIu
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1983; 33(3):522-8. PubMed ID: 6613344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responses of human auditory association cortex to the omission of an expected acoustic event.
    Hughes HC; Darcey TM; Barkan HI; Williamson PD; Roberts DW; Aslin CH
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jun; 13(6 Pt 1):1073-89. PubMed ID: 11352613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of auditory attention measured from human electrocorticograms.
    Neelon MF; Williams J; Garell PC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):504-21. PubMed ID: 16458596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The composite N1 component to gaps in noise.
    Pratt H; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Nov; 116(11):2648-63. PubMed ID: 16221565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The topography of the afferent and efferent flows in the mechanisms of auditory selective attention].
    Shostak VI; Lytaev SA; Golubeva LV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1994; 44(4-5):665-73. PubMed ID: 7810208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-focused attention speeds up auditory processing.
    Folyi T; Fehér B; Horváth J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 May; 84(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 22326595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related brain potentials to irrelevant auditory stimuli during selective listening: effects of channel probability.
    Akai T
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 15032985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The characteristics of evoked potentials due to omission of stimuli in a sequence of rhythmic auditory tones].
    Gurtubay IG; Artieda J
    Rev Neurol; 1999 Sep 1-15; 29(5):403-7. PubMed ID: 10584241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory event related potentials and source current density estimation in phonologic/auditory dyslexics.
    Moisescu-Yiflach T; Pratt H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Nov; 116(11):2632-47. PubMed ID: 16221569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
    Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary motor area contribution to attentional reorienting after distraction.
    Horváth J; Maess B; Berti S; Schröger E
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 18287943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation.
    Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 18346043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.