These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Topography of visual event-related potentials during geometric and phonetic discriminations. Lovrich D; Simson R; Vaughan HG; Ritter W Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Jan; 65(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 2416541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect. Stekelenburg JJ; Keetels M Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1209-19. PubMed ID: 26126803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spatial correspondence between functional MRI (fMRI) activations and cortical current density maps of event-related potentials (ERP): a study with four tasks. Minati L; Rosazza C; Zucca I; D'Incerti L; Scaioli V; Bruzzone MG Brain Topogr; 2008 Dec; 21(2):112-27. PubMed ID: 18758934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multiple generators in the auditory automatic discrimination process in humans. Kasai K; Nakagome K; Itoh K; Koshida I; Hata A; Iwanami A; Fukuda M; Hiramatsu KI; Kato N Neuroreport; 1999 Aug; 10(11):2267-71. PubMed ID: 10439446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A MEG analysis of the P300 in visual discrimination tasks. Mecklinger A; Maess B; Opitz B; Pfeifer E; Cheyne D; Weinberg H Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jan; 108(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 9474061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. EEG spectral dynamics during discrimination of auditory and visual targets. Mazaheri A; Picton TW Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 15922161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Eimer M Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 99(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 8862112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Audiovisual temporal discrimination is less efficient with aging: an event-related potential study. Setti A; Finnigan S; Sobolewski R; McLaren L; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Kenny RA; Newell FN Neuroreport; 2011 Aug; 22(11):554-8. PubMed ID: 21691233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity. Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing. Burton MW; Locasto PC; Krebs-Noble D; Gullapalli RP Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):647-61. PubMed ID: 15955475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Scalp distribution of early (0 to 10 msec) auditory evoked responses. Martin ME; Moore EJ Arch Otolaryngol; 1977 Jun; 103(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 869764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Alcohol-related ERP changes recorded from different modalities: a topographic analysis. Cohen HL; Ji J; Chorlian DB; Begleiter H; Porjesz B Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2002 Mar; 26(3):303-17. PubMed ID: 11923582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of visual attention on the intensity of auditory evoked potentials. Oatman LC Exp Neurol; 1976 Apr; 51(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 1261642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The relationship between the evoked potential and brain events in sensory discrimination and motor response. Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ Brain; 1984 Mar; 107 ( Pt 1)():241-51. PubMed ID: 6697158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Electrophysiological correlates of lateral interactions in human visual cortex. Khoe W; Freeman E; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1659-73. PubMed ID: 15136002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Stimulus modality and Go/NoGo effects on P3 during parallel visual and auditory continuous performance tasks. Tekok-Kilic A; Shucard JL; Shucard DW Psychophysiology; 2001 May; 38(3):578-89. PubMed ID: 11352146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Brain activity during auditory and visual phonological, spatial and simple discrimination tasks. Salo E; Rinne T; Salonen O; Alho K Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 1496():55-69. PubMed ID: 23261663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]