These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6615341)
1. Monaural and binaural intensity discrimination in normal and cochlear-impaired listeners. Hall JW; Fernandes MA Audiology; 1983; 22(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 6615341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors influencing the masking level difference in cochlear hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. Hall JW; Tyler RS; Fernandes MA J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 6717000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relating binaural pitch perception to the individual listener's auditory profile. Santurette S; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2968-86. PubMed ID: 22501074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners. Staffel JG; Hall JW; Grose JH; Pillsbury HC J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1720-7. PubMed ID: 2341676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency dependence of binaural performance in listeners with impaired binaural hearing. Gabriel KJ; Koehnke J; Colburn HS J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):336-47. PubMed ID: 1737882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss. Turner C; Burns EM; Nelson DA J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 6841823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monaural and binaural frequency selectivity in hearing-impaired subjects. Nitschmann M; Verhey JL; Kollmeier B Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):357-67. PubMed ID: 20210590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired. Hawkins DB; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Montgomery AA J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3560897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monaural and binaural loudness of 5- and 200-ms tones in normal and impaired hearing. Whilby S; Florentine M; Wagner E; Marozeau J J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3931-9. PubMed ID: 16838536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of binaural hearing aids. Markides A Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():181-96. PubMed ID: 6955925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forms of binaural summation and the implications of individual variability for binaural hearing aids. Haggard MP; Hall JW Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():47-63. PubMed ID: 6287568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stimulus duration and frequency discrimination for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Hall JW; Wood EJ J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 27(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 6738037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise. Marks LE J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 3819169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]