These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6616338)

  • 1. On the recognition of words with inverted letters.
    Tzelgov J; Henik A
    Can J Psychol; 1983 Jun; 37(2):233-42. PubMed ID: 6616338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual word recognition of three-letter words as derived from the recognition of the constitutent letters.
    Bouwhuis D; Bouma H
    Percept Psychophys; 1979 Jan; 25(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 432085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification and pronunciation effects in a verbal reaction time task for words, pseudowords, and letters.
    Rossmeissl PG; Theios J
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 7176904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spelling-sound effects in reading: time-course and decision criteria.
    Waters GS; Seidenberg MS
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Nov; 13(6):557-72. PubMed ID: 3831712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Encoding and contextual components of word recognition in good and poor readers.
    Simpson GB; Lorsbach TC; Whitehouse D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1983 Feb; 35(1):161-71. PubMed ID: 6827215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On priming by a sentence context.
    Stanovich KE; West RF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Mar; 112(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 6221061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lexical access and inflectional morphology.
    Caramazza A; Laudanna A; Romani C
    Cognition; 1988 Apr; 28(3):297-332. PubMed ID: 3359755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal dynamics of associative interference and facilitation produced by visual context.
    Grice GR; Boroughs JM; Canham L
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Dec; 36(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 6535094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Letter-naming as a function of intensity, degradation, S-R compatibility, and practice.
    Everett BL; Hochhaus L; Brown JR
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 May; 37(5):467-70. PubMed ID: 4047910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word superiority over isolated letters: the neglected case of forward masking.
    Jordan TR; Bevan KM
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 8035690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.
    Kahneman D; Chajczyk D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):497-509. PubMed ID: 6224888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Ellis AW; Young AW; Anderson C
    Brain Lang; 1988 Nov; 35(2):254-73. PubMed ID: 3208072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical influence of particular experiences in the perception of letters, words, and phrases.
    Whittlesea BW; Brooks LR
    Mem Cognit; 1988 Sep; 16(5):387-99. PubMed ID: 3173087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of lowercase letters in peripheral vision: a discrimination matrix based on saccade latencies.
    Jacobs AM; Nazir TA; Heller O
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 2755768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence.
    Adelman JS; Marquis SJ; Sabatos-DeVito MG
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1799-801. PubMed ID: 21030682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 May; 41(5):419-34. PubMed ID: 3601624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting letters in continuous text: effects of display size.
    Healy AF; Oliver WL; McNamara TP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 2953857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dichoptic backward masking of letters, words, and trigrams in old and young subjects.
    Cramer G; Kietzman ML; van Laer J
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 7128655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Size in the visual processing of faces and words.
    Kolers PA; Duchnicky RL; Sundstroem G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Dec; 11(6):726-51. PubMed ID: 2934505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.